- 30 Posts Started
- 1,722 Participant
- 1,752 Total Posts
The SC shouldnt have signed a NDA, why would they have to?
Something wrong big time here and has been from day one.
Slagged them off for not saying anything and then clearly not listened to them when they have said something. No surprises there really.
In order to try and save the club they needed access to the data room (this isn’t a real room bullshit it is a term used in business) and in order to access the data room (still not a real room) they needed to sign an NDA.
They are also trying to work with the admins and potential buyers so breaching their trust by posting every detail on social media isn’t going to work very well for them.
Last but not least, they have a top sports lawyer working with them who is advising them of what to say and when to say it. Granted he won’t know as much as bullshit, vatty and steve from scholes on what they can do legally.
I’ve said it a million times on here, business deals like this aren’t done on fucking twitter.
BTW…you still haven’t answered my questions about the assets the admins have sold and how administrations work.