Reply To: Stoke

Forums Latics Crazy Forum Stoke Reply To: Stoke

#199393
cup winnerscup winners
Player

    And then for fletcher to come on and miss probably the best chance of the game.
    Magennis looked awful in L1 him and Shinnie but as soon as they moved up in class it showed they can hold their own.

    You have to question why ?, why can every fan see Fletchers out his depth but the manager/s can’t ??. This to me points to us having to pay an appearance penalty if not played and the other reason I’m leaning towards as well is, Fletcher trains really well giving any manager no option bar play him.

    Now on that second point (I hope I’m wrong) I remember a certain Paul McGrath who after 7 years at Utd and a 163 appearances for Utd they got rid of him thinking he was coming to the end of the line with his knees (hardly ever trained) and the odd shandy. From there he did a further 7 years at Villa making over 250 appearances.
    My point to that is, not all players look red hot in training some don’t even like it so I hope Fletcher hasn’t been kept in because of that.
    I thought last night we looked far more balanced without him, there was abit more about us and we had a few good chances to put the game to bed earlier. Let’s not forget, Stoke were utter “don’t care seasons over” dog sh1t.

    I just wish I knew the truth why Fletchers started so many games after so many utter drivel performances it beggars belief and has frustrated not only me but 1000,’s of Latics fans who are all of the same opinion.

    Let’s hope he picks the same’ish side this Saturday. Millwall had their wings clipped last night after dominating large parts of the game.
    There’s a fair few teams still in the play off reckoning so I’m sure Millwall come to the DW with their backs up and their mob of “Living in the 80’s” 60 year old flat cap barrow boy, pearly king & queen, Chaz no Dave hoolies

    Grow up