The club was in a mess to be fair. Danson picked up a insane wage bill for 12 months and basically there was no way out of it for him other to say no or pay them these players were contracted.
He subsidised the cost of those wages till they’d all eventually departed June of this year. So I do understand that debt needs to be paid back.
I think the rules should change once a club are taken over from clubs in a financial mess.
Contracts should be renegotiated simply because they were agreed with the previous owners who gave up the club and didn’t pay their employees.
I mean it was so simple for players to just say “Right you missed my pay day I’m off” there should be a whole ruling on wages.
Now my bone to pick with Danson
He fully well knew the shit we were in, he fully well knew that when these contracts ended and that huge chain around the neck wage bill departed he would have to employ players on far less.
The bit I disagree with is getting rid and replacing the majority with loans zero hours,kids,and players with no league experience were a car crash waiting to happen.
Yes the club needs to balance the books and try and be self sufficient I get that but over time, gradually.
£4 million ? how much did we get for Lang? again undisclosed. I’ve said it before this club feels cold,uninviting,cloak n dagger, with no investment into first team signed (not loans) players.
There’s no argument about selling Hughes but what I saw Tuesday was frightening, bar Chambers I cannot see the makings of a side
To all those who’ve backed us win it ?
Bookies said thanks
