- This topic has 10 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Even though the officials didn’t spot Pedersson taking the corner to himself, no amount of appeals would have ever achieved retrospective action. Thankfully the result didn’t rob us of the points that might have saved our Premiership status, had we gone down. Hey, that’s football !
If you take retrospective action against one type of decision then you open the floodgates for any controversial issue during the whole 90 mins. Even when we’ve had red cards rescinded, the impact of the sending off on the game is not reviewed or interfered with. Okay, it can be cruel at times; but bleating about every decision isn’t the answer ( unless your a Geordie ).
Have you noticed that the worst ones for bleating about decisions, are the clubs that think they’re big clubs but actually aren’t?
Whining world champions, Liverpool, closely followed by Newcastle and west ham, and coincidentally they’re full of dirty shitbag players themselves, I give you Suarez, Gerrard, Cabaye, Tiote, and Nolan.
Reverse psychology at its finest, make everyone think youre hard done too, whilst being the biggest shower of c*nts there is.
Maybe we can get the England Vs Argentina replayed !With all the same players.
We will be witout a goalkeeper if they all have to drive there.
Obviously the recinding of a red card doesn’t affect the match in which the card was shown but can affect the fortunes of the team that were hard done too as they don’t suffer a suspension.
Personally, I like the way it works in Rugby League. Each and every match is reviewed from start to finish and if the referee missed something then the powers that be are able to bring the player to task and charge him. There’s nowhere to hide. Rio would have been done for kicking Torres, Rooney would have been done for elbowing McCarthy and Muamba would have been done for trying to break McCarthy in two.
Officials make mistakes but if we have the technology there to see the incidents clearly then we should use it imo.
Obviously the recinding of a red card doesn’t affect the match in which the card was shown but can affect the fortunes of the team that were hard done too as they don’t suffer a suspension.Personally, I like the way it works in Rugby League. Each and every match is reviewed from start to finish and if the referee missed something then the powers that be are able to bring the player to task and charge him. There’s nowhere to hide. Rio would have been done for kicking Torres, Rooney would have been done for elbowing McCarthy and Muamba would have been done for trying to break McCarthy in two.
Officials make mistakes but if we have the technology there to see the incidents clearly then we should use it imo.
Is that just super league only asking due to the fact that there are only 7 super league games covered in a weekend and one first div match I think maybe wrong but the point I’m making is that they would have a lot of matches to watch at the FA if that was the case including the championship and league 1 and 2 and maybe blue square prem as well
Obviously the recinding of a red card doesn’t affect the match in which the card was shown but can affect the fortunes of the team that were hard done too as they don’t suffer a suspension.
Personally, I like the way it works in Rugby League. Each and every match is reviewed from start to finish and if the referee missed something then the powers that be are able to bring the player to task and charge him. There’s nowhere to hide. Rio would have been done for kicking Torres, Rooney would have been done for elbowing McCarthy and Muamba would have been done for trying to break McCarthy in two.
Officials make mistakes but if we have the technology there to see the incidents clearly then we should use it imo.
Is that just super league only asking due to the fact that there are only 7 super league games covered in a weekend and one first div match I think maybe wrong but the point I’m making is that they would have a lot of matches to watch at the FA if that was the case including the championship and league 1 and 2 and maybe blue square prem as well[/quote]
Super League, Championship and Championship 1. Think it’s around 20 games in total. Granted not a lot compared to football but every game in football still has an official who watches the game and the refs undergo a performance review after the game.
In RL, every match is recorded and the referee has to go through a performance review in the week having watched the game back to see things that were missed/judged correctly. Any unsavoury incidents are flagged to the judiciary.
reet but to much hassle for the FA imoWell, it depends doesn’t it really. If every match is already reviewed and recorded then they clearly have enough evidence to do something about it.
The World saw the Rooney and Rio incidents above so they have no excuse for not punishing them.
Yes certain things will still get missed and I accept that, but if something has been seen then it should be punished accordingly whether the official did so on the day or not.
Obviously the recinding of a red card doesn’t affect the match in which the card was shown but can affect the fortunes of the team that were hard done too as they don’t suffer a suspension.Personally, I like the way it works in Rugby League. Each and every match is reviewed from start to finish and if the referee missed something then the powers that be are able to bring the player to task and charge him. There’s nowhere to hide. Rio would have been done for kicking Torres, Rooney would have been done for elbowing McCarthy and Muamba would have been done for trying to break McCarthy in two.
Officials make mistakes but if we have the technology there to see the incidents clearly then we should use it imo.
What I don’t like about the RL way of doing things is this putting an incident “on report” business. To me that’s a cop-out for referees and gives them an excuse not to make a decision for fear of it being wrong even though they may have seen it very clearly and warrant a sending-off. Introducing that into football would cause no end of controversy and chaos with players manipulating the ruling to their own advantage.
Obviously the recinding of a red card doesn’t affect the match in which the card was shown but can affect the fortunes of the team that were hard done too as they don’t suffer a suspension.
Personally, I like the way it works in Rugby League. Each and every match is reviewed from start to finish and if the referee missed something then the powers that be are able to bring the player to task and charge him. There’s nowhere to hide. Rio would have been done for kicking Torres, Rooney would have been done for elbowing McCarthy and Muamba would have been done for trying to break McCarthy in two.
Officials make mistakes but if we have the technology there to see the incidents clearly then we should use it imo.
What I don’t like about the RL way of doing things is this putting an incident “on report” business. To me that’s a cop-out for referees and gives them an excuse not to make a decision for fear of it being wrong even though they may have seen it very clearly and warrant a sending-off. Introducing that into football would cause no end of controversy and chaos with players manipulating the ruling to their own advantage.[/quote]
On report is something totally different. (I agree it’s a cop out and am not a fan of it)
On report is for incidents when a penalty is given but the officials are unsure whether it merited any further punishment or if any other players are involved.
The review panel can pick up ANYTHING in the game whether a penalty was given or not.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
