- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I said after the Wolves game that Gomez just aint good enough,
I got a bit of stick at the time,seems people are know agreeing with me.
Like I said before,Scharner is twice the player.
Aye and playing Scott Sinclair (out wide obv) would be even better imoSo, out of the team which started against Man City who would you drop to accommodate Sinclair?
So, out of the team which started against Man City who would you drop to accommodate Sinclair?
Answer – no-one, Sinclair was always gonna be on the bench. 8-)
I said after the Wolves game that Gomez just aint good enough,I got a bit of stick at the time,seems people are know agreeing with me.
Like I said before,Scharner is twice the player.
Perhaps some people are just as perceptive as you are but prefer to support their team rather than knock it. The simple fact of the matter is that Scharner is stronger on the ball, contributes greatly to our attack (It was his flick-on which led to our goal on Sunday) and is also really valuable defending set pieces.
Get the idea – glass half full and all that ?
I probably NOW would say we should have started with the team that we did, as we played well.. But to be fair i really dont think Scotland is good enough.. Move rodallega up front and put sinclair wide. I was saying similar when Gomez was the attacking-mid. that koumas should have gone there and Sinclair out wide.
I couldn’t complain about Gomez after the Villa game but since that i haven’t wanted him to start a game, He is NOT premiership quality.Aye and playing Scott Sinclair (out wide obv) would be even better imo
So, out of the team which started against Man City who would you drop to accommodate Sinclair?[/quote]
Scotland.
Midfield of: Sinclair/Thomas/Scharner/Diame/N’Zogbia
Hugo up top.
Well said egg-head
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
