- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Weird one that, ‘for inappropriate behaviour as a coach’ whilst at Bristol.
FA Cup Winners 2013, sounds good that
Judging by the fact that the FA must have used the word “safeguarding” in almost every sentence of their statement & Chief Exec’s interview, I can hazard a guess what it was that he was accused of whilst at Bristol
I don’t know much about employment law or what is in the report they’ve sacked him for but apparently they knew of this report when they employed him. Surely you can’t be sacked from your current role for something you did wrong in your previous job 4 years in if you declared this at the start? They also state there’s nothing in it to stop any future employment in football. So why sack him then?
Apparently they knew of its existence but because of the confidentiality of some of the accusers the report wasn’t made public & the head honchos didn’t read it as it was recommended that he could still coach.
However as they’ve now read it & seen what he was accused of &, presumably, proved to have done it had raised as I said safeguarding issues & isn’t behaviour consistent with being the manager of the England women’s team.
As such they’re perfectly entitled to sack him now regardless of whether they carried out proper checks when he was appointed
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
