- This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Supposedly joining on season long loan.
From all accounnts he is a special talent and destined for a big future at LFC. They apparently turned down a £1M offer for him from us earlier in the summer.
So if this lad is playing shite Latics must play him because of the 75% clause or face a fine FFS?
Shouldnt the club be looking at strikers? A bit threadbare in that department!
Fuck the EFL
We have two strikers and that’s plenty. Can only play one at a time.
What position does this lad play?http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/535588/Liverpool-Transfer-News-Cameron-Brannagan-Wigan-Jurgen-KloppSo if this lad is playing shite Latics must play him because of the 75% clause or face a fine FFS?
Shouldnt the club be looking at strikers? A bit threadbare in that department!
Do you really think the club aren’t looking for stickers?
So if this lad is playing shite Latics must play him because of the 75% clause or face a fine FFS?
Shouldnt the club be looking at strikers? A bit threadbare in that department!
Do you really think the club aren’t looking for stickers?[/quote]
I dont care how many stickers they are looking at it’s another striker we need and pronto!
It won’t be reet if other lads are playing out of their skins and putting in the effort in training and have to make way for a lad that is virtually guaranteed a start no matter what!
Fuck the EFL
Bollocks to the Scouscers if they have too many players sell them. If they do not want to sell then play them in their development sides. Why let these Greedy clubs dictate to us. This loan thing should be closely scrutinised by footballs ruling bodies.
All quiet on this front, I thought the deal had been sealed so how come it has not yet been confirmed?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
