- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
..to their parent clubs Junior and Revell. :woohoo:
Junior due to a long term niggling injury [groin] and Revell due to personal circumstances.
Would have liked to have kept them both, particularly Junior, as he showed so much promise. I think that will explain why he hasn’t been getting a regular game, nothing to do with the incompetency of the manager. B)
Revell did a good filling in job, showed real enthusiasm for a loan player. Perhaps him going back may pave the way for the return of a rejuvenated Grant Holt. He played one game scoring no goals for Wolves and was sat on the bench for most of his loan period. I suppose he may as well sit on ours and play the experienced impact player role for the rest of the season. We will be able to see the £4m trading loss rack up to nearly £5m over the next few months. :ohmy:
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!We won’t ever know but if he had been in favour with Rosler he may just have got us the goals to have clinched promotion back to the Premier League or last season be may just not have been injured and again got us the goals to have kept us up but the management are paid to manage and know best and now we are down here. Either of those scenarios and that money quoted would have been insignificant.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
