- This topic has 6,051 replies, 69 voices, and was last updated 3 days, 9 hours ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Well I failed dismally there then dinnI?
Blinkin’ 3000 people I asked to turn up let me down. You just can’t rely on some people can you?
But I’ll never ‘do a May’ and pay people to help me out.
Probably.
But Villa brought shed loads more than QPR.Yeah I know Garswood, but you would expect more home fans for the bigger teams, strange lot us men.[/quote]
Maybe more of an expectation pre-match of us beating QPR than Villa.Thought there were more wigan fans on today than the villa gameMaybe season ticket holders turned up today as the sun was shining.
Updated prediction League table after 16 Matches.
Horc 26
Zeb2 23
Jayt 14
Pie Army 13
Grumpy 12
Blueneon 12
Garswood latic 11
runcornfan1978 7
The Egg 6
Eastender 5
Simmpool 4
Dez Mondo 3
Crammy yick 3
GoalsGalore 3
Donnypage 3
Jrfatfan 3
Super Stuart Barlow 2
Filmoss 1
Travis 1
Pemblue 1932 1
Nuneatonlatic 0
Vat69 0
Treated 0
Bullit 0
Jimmyc 0
Snowblind 0
dnr 0
Accord 0
Thty5yearswafc 0
Lostock Hall Latic 0Congratulations to jrfatfan, off the mark in week 16 with a second place.
20 predictors have at least one point now.
All to play for with at least eight matches to go. (Play offs are still possible??)I hope there’s not going to be a VAR review today :DWell done garswood, your first win of the season and so nearly a bonus as well, no need for VAR it was an easy decision.
Thought there were more wigan fans on today than the villa game
Maybe season ticket holders turned up today as the sun was shining.[/quote]
Was it a bit cheaper than the Villa game as well?
Thought there were more wigan fans on today than the villa game9383 home fans V Aston Villa
9029 home fans V QPRThought there were more wigan fans on today than the villa game
9383 home fans V Aston Villa
9029 home fans V QPR[/quote]
Fair do’s on the stats horc, East stand looked more busy today E2and3 looked more full from where I was sat.What about my prediction of 9696? You missed it?Technically your prediction of 9696 should not be allowed, as it was within 5 of another prediction. As I missed it, and failed to tell you that you needed to change it, I will let it stand, and give you the one point for third place.
Revised points scorers versus QPR were –
garswood_latic – (9804) 5 off – 5 points
jrfatfan – (9873) – 74 off – 3 points
Travis – (9696) – 103 off – 1 pointRevised prediction League table after 16 Matches.
Horc 25
Zeb2 23
Jayt 14
Pie Army 13
Grumpy 12
Blueneon 12
Garswood latic 11
runcornfan1978 7
The Egg 6
Eastender 5
Simmpool 4
Dez Mondo 3
Crammy yick 3
GoalsGalore 3
Donnypage 3
Jrfatfan 3
Super Stuart Barlow 2
Travis 2
Filmoss 1
Pemblue 1932 1
Nuneatonlatic 0
Vat69 0
Treated 0
Bullit 0
Jimmyc 0
Snowblind 0
dnr 0
Accord 0
Thty5yearswafc 0
Lostock Hall Latic 0Revised points scorers versus QPR were –garswood_latic – (9804) 5 off – 5 points
jrfatfan – (9873) – 74 off – 3 points
Travis – (9696) – 103 off – 1 pointFair play. Hope you don’t lose it by a point. Didn’t know about ‘the within 5’ rule. Must have missed that. If you had pointed that out and I had to pick again I would have gone for 9700 ;) ;)
Revised points scorers versus QPR were –
garswood_latic – (9804) 5 off – 5 points
jrfatfan – (9873) – 74 off – 3 points
Travis – (9696) – 103 off – 1 pointFair play. Hope you don’t lose it by a point. Didn’t know about ‘the within 5’ rule. Must have missed that. If you had pointed that out and I had to pick again I would have gone for 9700 ;) ;)[/quote]
I brought the rule in a few months ago. Zeb2 was on a roll and some posters started to mirror his predictions by predicting one more or one less than him. I thought it was a bit unsporting so I made the new rule.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
