Ronnie Stam

Forums Latics Crazy Forum Ronnie Stam

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #82625
    Anonymous

      does anybody else think he should be in the team?

      we give Beausejour the freedom to go forward with a defensive full back behind him and he looks 2 stone overweight, has’nt got the pace or skill to beat a man and can’t cross a ball, most crosses go out for a goal kick.

      If we gave Stam the same sort of cover with Boyce because lets face it he can’t work the line now he seems to have lost his pace and was never the best going forward. Stam would get a lot more qaulity balls in the box and looks a damb site more mobile and threatening than Beausejor.

      #82633

      I think should be starting but not in place of Beausejour, but instead of Boyce. I like Boyce, but of we’re playing with a right wing back, Stam is much more suited.

      Must admit that’s one of the biggest things I don’t get about Bobby’s recent selections

      #82634
      we give Beausejour the freedom to go forward with a defensive full back behind him and he looks 2 stone overweight, has’nt got the pace or skill to beat a man and can’t cross a ball, most crosses go out for a goal kick.

      You are joking aren’t you?

      In my opinion, some of his crossing has been superb, and in general, I think he’s been one of the better players over recent weeks.

      #82644
      I think should be starting but not in place of Beausejour, but instead of Boyce. I like Boyce, but of we’re playing with a right wing back, Stam is much more suited.

      Must admit that’s one of the biggest things I don’t get about Bobby’s recent selections

      Agreed I think he should be at right wing back instead of Boyce. I would however put Boyce in the back 3 in place of either Alcaraz or Figueroa.
      I would also drop Gomez & put McCarthy in that free attacking midfield role which i think he is much more suited to & then I’d put Diame into the more conventional midfield role vacated by McCarthy.
      Finally Rodallega in place of Di Santo

      Piece of pish this management lark

      #82647

      I think should be starting but not in place of Beausejour, but instead of Boyce. I like Boyce, but of we’re playing with a right wing back, Stam is much more suited.

      Must admit that’s one of the biggest things I don’t get about Bobby’s recent selections

      Agreed I think he should be at right wing back instead of Boyce. I would however put Boyce in the back 3 in place of either Alcaraz or Figueroa.
      I would also drop Gomez & put McCarthy in that free attacking midfield role which i think he is much more suited to & then I’d put Diame into the more conventional midfield role vacated by McCarthy.
      Finally Rodallega in place of Di Santo

      Piece of pish this management lark[/quote]

      That was pretty much the view of the V100s pre-match on Saturday. Yes, shock horror! – advocating dropping Gomez!!!

      And as poor as Rodallega has been at scoring and playing the lone striker role, the view was that he carries more of a goal threat than Di Santo.

      #82649

      Great minds think alike Griff – well sometimes!!

      #82685
      The EggThe Egg
      Player
        hat was pretty much the view of the V100s pre-match on Saturday. Yes, shock horror! – advocating dropping Gomez!!!

        And as poor as Rodallega has been at scoring and playing the lone striker role, the view was that he carries more of a goal threat than Di Santo.

        I’d say you carry more of a goal threat than Di Flecto.

        #82694

        And as poor as Rodallega has been at scoring and playing the lone striker role, the view was that he carries more of a goal threat than Di Santo.

        I’d say you carry more of a goal threat than Di Flecto.[/quote]

        You’d be the only one that would say that, Eggy!!

        #82696

        And as poor as Rodallega has been at scoring and playing the lone striker role, the view was that he carries more of a goal threat than Di Santo.

        I’d say you carry more of a goal threat than Di Flecto.[/quote]

        You’d be the only one that would say that, Eggy!![/quote]
        Agreed

        #82704
        MR BrownbillMR Brownbill
        Player

          At Old Trafford Stam whippped in delightful balls only not much point when as per usual we have no one busting a gut to get on end of them.

          #82706
          Anonymous

            I seen to remember Sammon jumping under one, still not sure how he managed it.

            But with qaulity he gives he surely got to be in the team.

            #82735
            The EggThe Egg
            Player

              And as poor as Rodallega has been at scoring and playing the lone striker role, the view was that he carries more of a goal threat than Di Santo.

              I’d say you carry more of a goal threat than Di Flecto.[/quote]

              You’d be the only one that would say that, Eggy!![/quote]

              Well granted I’ve never seen you play so maybe not :P

              #82899

              Had a dream last night that stam scored a hattrick of own goals to send us down…

              hope he doesn’t start today…

              #82906
              filmossfilmoss
              Player

                Stam wont be playing for us ever again as he has wrote something derogatory about the manager in his book ! Oh hang on that was another Stam !! Carry on !!

              Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

              Forums Latics Crazy Forum Ronnie Stam