- This topic has 37 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Pfffff.. more like already down and Barrow sacked.
More like down….and Barrow installed on a 2 year contract.
Can see it happening.
Pfffff.. more like already down and Barrow sacked.
More like down….and Barrow installed on a 2 year contract.
Can see it happening.[/quote]
I hope to fuck that you are wrong.
Pfffff.. more like already down and Barrow sacked.
More like down….and Barrow installed on a 2 year contract.
Can see it happening.[/quote]
I hope to fuck that you are wrong.[/quote]
I won’t renew if it’s Barrow, bollocks to that blind faith malarkey !
we might be only 1 point from safety…We could and that is the message that needs to be flooded through to the players, but sadly they look lost, down and I can’t see them being able to lift in order to get the points we need.
It’s not over until it’s over !
For Me, the next game: Gilbey & Morsy must start together. We must get as much of the game that we can, out of Nick Powell; he is a class apart if he wants to be. Same with Obertan; he showed some moments of class today. Feel safer with Gilks in nets. Jack Byrne looked keen and useful when he came on; so he should play a part in the game.
Yes yes but Barrow is not picking the team is he?
If Sharon or more likely Whelan says so and so plays then they play….as in the Stoke goalie against Rotherham.
Barrow is a puppet who if he had a scrap of dignity would have walked as soon as them two started picking the team.
We are a disgrace,embarrassment and shambles from top to bottom.
BARROW OUT.
Yes yes but Barrow is not picking the team is he?If Sharon or more likely Whelan says so and so plays then they play….as in the Stoke goalie against Rotherham.
Barrow is a puppet who if he had a scrap of dignity would have walked as soon as them two started picking the team.
We are a disgrace,embarrassment and shambles from top to bottom.
U
BARROW OUT.You don’t actually believe that do you?
Please tell me this is a wind up.
But it’s also possibly something to do with fact that Jakob is a loan player and part of the deal will have been that he has to play a certain percentage of games when he is fit. If we don’t hold to our part of the bargain I could see that we would face a financial penalty for not playing him – which perhaps the club doesn’t want to do?
The puppet has admitted dropping Gilks was nowt to do with him.PUPPET OUT
Apparenty, he dropped Gilks because it would have been Gilks’ 10th game and we’d have had to pay Rangers a fee for him.
But aside from that, you still reckon Sharpe is picking the team?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
