- This topic has 16 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 7 months, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
£55K a game for a stadium in a shit-hole part of a run down Northern town versus what West Ham pay for exclusive use of the Olympic stadium?
I’ll have a pint of whatever you are drinking!
With regard to the other matter – perhaps your owners should have been more welcoming, instead of pandering to the anti-rugby minority. Result is you and your ilk get to fund the shortfall through increased season ticket prices.
I really don’t think there has been any pandering to the anti rugby minority. They are trying to run a business and the Warriors have probably got away with it for too long. You can’t compare it to the West Ham situation which we all know is wrong. We are comparing it to similar football / rugby rental arrangements where even now the Warriors are paying below the going rate. I think our owners have been more than welcoming to the Warriors. Incidentally ,I think next seasons tickets are competitively priced.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13161421/filing-history
£7.7m loss. Would have been £10m if it wasnt for Dan Burn’s sell-on fee.
Wages 156% of income – that is not good. Nor is the directors taking out 4 times what they took out the previous year.
No wonder the owner isnt throwing his cash around. Everyone knew that whoever bought the club would have to have deep pockets to fund the shortfalls.
On the bright side, stadium rental brought in £657,774
Think we need to up the rent ! Why are you so interested in Latics accounts Mutty ? The Warriors made big losses too , I would concentrate on them if I were you.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
