bruce should not be credited for the signing of valencia and it should not be in his plus or minus columns and nobody has suggested that anyway.
The question asked by the originator of this thread was value for money and which of the 4 premiership managers we have had has provided the best value.
On the face of it his figures go on to show that martinez has given the best value, but if you examine the figures closer he used less than reliable details to come up with that nonsense and that is all I have said and will repeat martinez is being credited with a plus colummn that is 30 million pounds more that the actual truth – but once again why let truth get in the way of legitimising how much martinez is better than his predecessors.
