› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › A Theory on Paul Cook
- This topic has 25 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 3 months ago by MR Brownbill.
-
AuthorPosts
-
28 December 2019 at 2:34 pm #183403Why would they sign Lowe for that, hes shite
Agree he is shite but we never see him as a winger. He may be ok in his correct position. Somehow I can’t see it though. No better than Massey and that doesn’t say much really.
28 December 2019 at 2:57 pm #183405I for one dont think Lowe is sh1te. IMO he is another of our players who has found the step up from league 1 to the championship harder than he perhaps thought. But I do agree. He would be better suited to a wing.
My front 4 would be:
Moore (or Garner)
Windass behind
Lowe & Pilkington on the wings.
28 December 2019 at 3:03 pm #183406I for one dont think Lowe is sh1te. IMO he is another of our players who has found the step up from league 1 to the championship harder than he perhaps thought. But I do agree. He would be better suited to a wing.My front 4 would be:
Moore (or Garner)
Windass behind
Lowe & Pilkington on the wings.
Agree and when the subs were made on Thursday we had a chance of doing that. Windass was running rings around the Derby defence and should have been moved back in support of Garner. But oh no, we can’t do that. But watch out Sunday the mighty Massey will be back.
28 December 2019 at 5:08 pm #183414I for one dont think Lowe is sh1te. IMO he is another of our players who has found the step up from league 1 to the championship harder than he perhaps thought. But I do agree. He would be better suited to a wing.
My front 4 would be:
Moore (or Garner)
Windass behind
Lowe & Pilkington on the wings.
Agree and when the subs were made on Thursday we had a chance of doing that. Windass was running rings around the Derby defence and should have been moved back in support of Garner. But oh no, we can’t do that. But watch out Sunday the mighty Massey will be back.[/quote]
I thought windass should have stayed on donny.
28 December 2019 at 7:44 pm #183421Playing like he was he would be ideal with that work rate to give the lone striker much needed support in the centre attacking midfield role.
Still need a vast improvement from Lowe on the right and from whoever plays on the left. The attacking midfield positions have been really unimpressive all season but to be fair there have been so many variations it’s hardly surprising the whole front four have not yet gelled.29 December 2019 at 12:33 am #183442Heres my theory on Cook…..
HE IS A FUCKING FRAUD.
29 December 2019 at 12:42 am #183446Did your mate at barclays tell you that?
29 December 2019 at 12:51 am #183448Did your mate at barclays tell you that?Straightener, pal? Want one?
29 December 2019 at 1:51 am #183450Not like you to revert to threats of violence vat
29 December 2019 at 4:59 am #183455Heres my theory on Cook…..HE IS A FUCKING FRAUD.
I don’t know Vatty lad but 12 wins from the last 63 games isn’t too bad considering it is such an unforgiving league.
29 December 2019 at 11:04 pm #183483Garner a goalscorer…….but for 3 games over Christmas he chooses to start without one. The end result is 1 goal scored by Garner and the bell end still chooses to start yet again without him. We then concede……within 1 min he takes of pointless Massey and on comes grandad……not Garner, Geldhardt,……..enough said….our complete disaster away from home speaks for itself……Cook is massively out of his league and should have some integrity and piss off now before he completely screws this club up …..if he’s not done it already.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › A Theory on Paul Cook