At the time of posting…

Forums Latics Crazy Forum At the time of posting…

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #80888

    … I have made 5434 posts.

    5434. Now then, THAT would be a winning formation. A solid 5 at the back, a good defensive cordon of 4 in front of them, and 3 attackling midfielders. Only issue I can see is that we don’t have 4 half-decent strikers :(

    #80889
    SammySammy
    Player

      So you think starting with 16 outfield players will make a difference?

      #80891

      You’d like to think it would at least bring the midfield closer to the attack.

      Maybe

      #80892

      Or the opportunity for more short passes to be made in our own half.

      We could also have three players ready to accept a short corner.

      #80903
      JohnDoeTony
      Player

        Utd would get away with that formation if Howard Webb was reffing!

        #80915

        There was a play in the Superbowl on Sunday when the Patriots had 12 players on the pitch. They did get penalised though.

        #80995
        The EggThe Egg
        Chairman

          We’d probably still get caught out at the back with 16 men.

          #80998
          horchorc
          Manager
            There was a play in the Superbowl on Sunday when the Patriots had 12 players on the pitch. They did get penalised though.

            You don’t watch that shite do you Garswood? It’s RL in a party frock.

            #81001
            Anonymous

              There was a play in the Superbowl on Sunday when the Patriots had 12 players on the pitch. They did get penalised though.

              You don’t watch that shite do you Garswood? It’s RL in a party frock.[/quote]

              Thugby with helmets and slightly more entertaining

            Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

            Forums Latics Crazy Forum At the time of posting…