- This topic has 19 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Past matches with with these men there defenders get a bit physical with are men so would you start with sammon and di santo rather than rodshitalaga who always ends up on the floor
Past matches with with these men there defenders get a bit physical with are men so would you start with sammon and di santo rather than rodshitalaga who always ends up on the floor
“rodshitalaga “??You were in danger of being taken seriously until that point. How childish is that? Grow up, man – you’re better than that.
:naughty:Now, here’s a thought… in a nod to the big man, little man thing that the 442 brigade* seem to think will work just because it does, how about Sammon and McManaman :think:
* I’m not necessarily anti-442
Sammon and McManaman
Great idea griff, its not has though any of our regular strikers can score! I reckon McManaman is gonna be a good un in a few years!
o
Past matches with with these men there defenders get a bit physical with are men so would you start with sammon and di santo rather than rodshitalaga who always ends up on the floor
“rodshitalaga “??
You were in danger of being taken seriously until that point. How childish is that? Grow up, man – you’re better than that.
:naughty:Now, here’s a thought… in a nod to the big man, little man thing that the 442 brigade* seem to think will work just because it does, how about Sammon and McManaman :think:
* I’m not necessarily anti-442[/quote]
i didnt mean the big man,little man tag team,with them haveing ridgewell,bowyer and ferguson who always make it known there on the pitch,perhaps di santo whos a lot more physical and harder to get the ball off than rodellaga and looking at sammon i think he can hold more than his own agaist them three,look at wba brought on odemwingie in 2nd half whos strong physical and they couldnt cope with getting a taste of there own medicineDiSanto why would you play him????? When were struggling for goals you want players who have a goal in them.
He makes Scotland look prolific, absolute cack.
No doubt a very big game this for both sides
Again no doubt that Brum will sell out their allocation – the club needs to get proactive NOW promoting this
DiSanto why would you play him????? When were struggling for goals you want players who have a goal in them.He makes Scotland look prolific, absolute cack.
you mean like rodelaga who at city with best part of 100 million quids worth of defenders keeps going for glory when he could have laid the ball off at least 3 times to mccarthy who was unmarked.My point is di santo is much more physical presence who can hold the ball for sammon where has rodelaga gets pushed off the ball to easy and if he hasnt had no joy after 20 mins he dosent want to know
agree with what aceface said, although i used to love hot rod he’s really aching my balls at the minute. I like di santo, think he holds the ball up well and has a trick or two.
he just cant score :angry-banghead: :angry-banghead: :angry-banghead:Taken on extra meaning now as Brum have picked up a point at Everton taking them out the bottom 3 on GD.
Lose to them and we’ll be at LEAST 5 away from safety. I do think that this game could seal our fate.
Just goes to show the luck some teams are getting. I watched tonight’s Everton game and Brum looked awful. Everton should have been out of sight but yet Brum get a point.
We gave as much as we got at city and got nowt. :(From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!” We gave as much as we got at city and got nowt.”
That could be because City were dire !! At the end of the day they shouldn’t have scored should they ! :doh:
DiSanto why would you play him????? When were struggling for goals you want players who have a goal in them.
He makes Scotland look prolific, absolute cack.
you mean like rodelaga who at city with best part of 100 million quids worth of defenders keeps going for glory when he could have laid the ball off at least 3 times to mccarthy who was unmarked.My point is di santo is much more physical presence who can hold the ball for sammon where has rodelaga gets pushed off the ball to easy and if he hasnt had no joy after 20 mins he dosent want to know[/quote]
IMO Hugo would play off Sammon as he looks to be a big strong lad who can hold the ball up and looks tall enough to win some headers.
Wether you like Hugo or not he is our best chance of a goal so for me he has to play.
DiSanto why would you play him????? When were struggling for goals you want players who have a goal in them.
He makes Scotland look prolific, absolute cack.
you mean like rodelaga who at city with best part of 100 million quids worth of defenders keeps going for glory when he could have laid the ball off at least 3 times to mccarthy who was unmarked.My point is di santo is much more physical presence who can hold the ball for sammon where has rodelaga gets pushed off the ball to easy and if he hasnt had no joy after 20 mins he dosent want to know[/quote]
IMO Hugo would play off Sammon as he looks to be a big strong lad who can hold the ball up and looks tall enough to win some headers.
Wether you like Hugo or not he is our best chance of a goal so for me he has to play.[/quote]
Oh and by the way DiSanto is absolute cack so it’s a no brainer.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
