- This topic has 25 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Aye. Let’s forget the number of assists Yanic had last season and the key goals scored. Let’s forget he’s our most dangerous player by a country mile. Blackburn were terrified of him whilst Birmingham doubled up on him at times. And for all the Pearce lovers I presume if it was common knowledge he was available why were only Third tier clubs in for him if he’s that good?
Aye. Let’s forget the number of assists Yanic had last season and the key goals scored. Let’s forget he’s our most dangerous player by a country mile. Blackburn were terrified of him whilst Birmingham doubled up on him at times.He is a danger no doubt but his final ball/decision making is poor at times which is why he is at Wigan Athletic.
His pace is a danger if he is 1 on 1 but if sides double up he doesn’t have the ability to beat both men. The good thing is though that it leaves a gap for the likes of Gilbey and Jacobs to exploit which they did against Birmingham.
No Super Stu, back in 1960 it was 2 3 5.
Wonder where Super Stu would have fit in to this 3 5 1, 5 3 1. Would he be the one or playing deep behind the one.No Super Stu, back in 1960 it was 2 3 5.
Wonder where Super Stu would have fit in to this 3 5 1, 5 3 1. Would he be the one or playing deep behind the one.To be fair to super stu donny, & if i remember, ray mathias played super stuart barlow on one wing along with andy liddell on the other & simon howarth as a lone striker. Whether that formation was a 4 5 1 or a 4 3 3 im not too sure. But stuart barlow did play in a similar formation.
What about yourself mr page. Would yourself, phil daley & mark hilditch have managed with such a formation(s)?
No Super Stu, back in 1960 it was 2 3 5.
Wonder where Super Stu would have fit in to this 3 5 1, 5 3 1. Would he be the one or playing deep behind the one.To be fair to super stu donny, & if i remember, ray mathias played super stuart barlow on one wing along with andy liddell on the other & simon howarth as a lone striker. Whether that formation was a 4 5 1 or a 4 3 3 im not too sure. But stuart barlow did play in a similar formation.
What about yourself mr page. Would yourself, phil daley & mark hilditch have managed with such a formation(s)?[/quote]
Correct. Best front 3 going at the time.
Only crap teams from crap clubs play 442 nowadays. Ancient managers who think its 1960.Like Leicester you mean?? :dry:
It was El boring one who introduced us to the lone striker way of football and what a yawn his football was.
On MoTD on Saturday Phil Neville was praising the 442 system and the managers who are starting to be brave enough to adopt it.
More clubs are having a go at it these days, if not for full games, certainley at some point throughout games.It was El boring one who introduced us to the lone striker way of football and what a yawn his football was.To be fair donny, it doesn’t matter whether we adopt 1, 2, 3 or more strikers during the game. Martinez style of football was slow & boring i agree. Caldwell on the other hand has adopted more or less the same tactics, formations etc; but at a much quicker pace.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
