- This topic has 38 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
A better comparison would be between teams who play the same sport.
Latics v Bolton ,Blackburn ,Man Utd ,Liverpool
then
Warriors V St Helens ,Warrington,Huddersfield ,LeedsChrist on a Bike, you cannot do that….
Rule No 1. Always always bring Rugby up when talking about WAFC Attendances.
Rule No 2. Go back to rule No 1 and try again.
make attendances up,your joking! on their official site, there was 29,627 on st helens away sat 02 may. have a look
That game was played at Edinburgh as part of the magic weekend and the attendance for the day was 29,627. Quite correct to quote that amount as did St Helens http://www.saintsrlfc.com/results/99
make attendances up,your joking! on their official site, there was 29,627 on st helens away sat 02 may. have a look
That game was played at Edinburgh as part of the magic weekend and the attendance for the day was 29,627. Quite correct to quote that amount as did St Helens http://www.saintsrlfc.com/results/99
And how many sets of fans were there that day – 4, 6 or 8???
Because it wasn’t just Saints and Warriors fans was it?
FA Cup Winners 2013, sounds good that
Christ on a Bike, you cannot do that….Rule No 1. Always always bring Rugby up when talking about WAFC Attendances.
Rule No 2. Go back to rule No 1 and try again.
What we really should do , is compare how old each club is, surely the younger club which used to have an average of 1200 should have the lowest crowds,
make attendances up,your joking! on their official site, there was 29,627 on st helens away sat 02 may. have a look
That game was played at Edinburgh as part of the magic weekend and the attendance for the day was 29,627. Quite correct to quote that amount as did St Helens http://www.saintsrlfc.com/results/99
And how many sets of fans were there that day – 4, 6 or 8???
Because it wasn’t just Saints and Warriors fans was it?[/quote]
3 games that day. Harlequins v Salford and Wakefield v Bradford. Neither game had the fans flocking.
Incidentally, the day after 4 games were played and only 1,000 more turned up than on Saturday.
Yeah. Why dont you put WAFC’s attendances in brackets next to each one of those 20 figures?
2009/10 17,413 so far.
2008/09 18,350
2007/08 19,046
2006/07 18,159
2005/06 20,233
2004/05 11,942
2003/04 9,483
2002/03 7,288
2001/02 5,850
2000/01 6,774
1999/00 7,007
1998/99 4,250
1997/98 3,968
1996/97 3,899
1995/96 2,986
1994/95 1,845
1993/94 2,593
1992/93 2,810
1991/92 2,873
1990/91 2,769There you go mutty, makes quite impressive reading actually.
Incidentally its 7 (SEVEN) years since you averaged more than us, and our lowest average over the last five years is still over 2,000 above your highest ever average.
Your average this season looks set to be 14,000, thats over 4,000 less than ours last season.
Still want to compare attendances?
Now run along back to your 6 fingered inbreds and leave us alone.[/quote]They averaged more than us in 05, which was 4 years ago not 7 mate. Who gives a funk anyway.
More importantly, look at the growth in our attendances over the years.
Bloody fantastic, as it happens. No other club’s support has grown so much. What? From the 1400 or so we got in 1995? Brilliant.
More importantly, look at the growth in our attendances over the years.Bloody fantastic, as it happens. No other club’s support has grown so much. What? From the 1400 or so we got in 1995? Brilliant.
Thats why I put it up. I know they were p**s poor early on, but to see the rise to now actually in print looks great.
The rugby attendances are down because they now need 2 seats to park their fat ass.Was you born an arshole or have you had special training?
The rugby attendances are down because they now need 2 seats to park their fat ass.
Was you born an arshole or have you had special training?[/quote]
Not bad fatty…….wait 12 hours for a bite and it’s a retarded ass-wipe.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
