› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › great win..but
- This topic has 14 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by john bonney.
-
AuthorPosts
-
27 September 2009 at 6:35 pm #9822
What a fantastic result. I just wish we could have done um with them having 11 men, first choice goalie and without a debatable pen. Then it would have better than fantastic.
27 September 2009 at 6:46 pm #9825To be honest, I dont think there was a debate. We would have scored only for Cech and also when their replacement keeper came on, he had a word with Hugo to try and put him off. Im glad it went the way it did, its not often we get treated fairly against one of the big boys, just shows what can happen when you remove the bias. May be Roman forgot to pay the ref. ;)
27 September 2009 at 7:03 pm #9829Hmmmm I don’t think penalties come any more stonewall than that.
27 September 2009 at 9:21 pm #98461. The penalty was a stonewaller.
2. Considering the luck we’ve had with refs against the top 4 in recent years, even if it wasn’t a pen, it deserved to be one. If that makes sense.27 September 2009 at 10:54 pm #9857Mr Logic
If you aren’t satsified with a stupendos 3-1 win over the leaders Chelsea, you may as well just forget the whole thing.
27 September 2009 at 11:07 pm #9859Mr LogicIf you aren’t satsified with a stupendos 3-1 win over the leaders Chelsea, you may as well just forget the whole thing.
He is obviously just a wind up merchant with nowt better to do.
28 September 2009 at 1:55 am #9880Mr. Logic – no buts… 3-1 fucking fair and square, OK
28 September 2009 at 3:19 am #9885all opinions, but do you think we would have one v 11 men and czech in goal?
28 September 2009 at 10:02 am #9887all opinions, but do you think we would have one v 11 men and czech in goal?YES
28 September 2009 at 10:24 am #9888all opinions, but do you think we would have one v 11 men and czech in goal?We would have led 2-1 for sure had Cech not fouled Hugo. We would have been the team to end Chelseas 100% run at the very least.
28 September 2009 at 11:54 am #9891all opinions, but do you think we would have one v 11 men and czech in goal?
We would have led 2-1 for sure had Cech not fouled Hugo. We would have been the team to end Chelseas 100% run at the very least.[/quote]
I’m as stunned at that comment as I was by our win on Saturday!
Where did you go for that holiday you had? Damascus?
29 September 2009 at 2:10 am #9956What a fantastic result. I just wish we could have done um with them having 11 men, first choice goalie and without a debatable pen. Then it would have better than fantastic.Is that you George ?
29 September 2009 at 3:17 am #9957best, formby, washington, orwell, the 1V, graham,urquhart, ..and my uncle…..anyone else?
30 September 2009 at 2:44 pm #10023I did’nt think that penalty at Everton was a penalty,swings and roundabouts.But Chech did move his leg to trip, and Dowd was on the spot.Every one the commentator, and all three on MoTD and ME thought it was, a bit of honesty for a change.
30 September 2009 at 3:04 pm #10028“I did’nt think that penalty at Everton was a penalty”
You must be the only one then. :roll:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › great win..but