- This topic has 20 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Damage has been done now so what would be the point now in incurring further financial penalty’s. This is just another reflection on a crazy season of dealing like the Morsy and Bogdan shambles not to mention the signing of God knows how many other players that were just not up for it or unfit and moving on our own players who make regular appearances for the clubs they are loaned to.
On the other hand a win on Saturday and other results going our way and we may have to gamble otherwise.So it is true according to wep that haugaard as to play every game until the end of the season. That is absolute ridiculous
So it is true according to wep that haugaard as to play every game until the end of the season. That is absolute ridiculousWho was the dickhead that sanctioned this deal? That’s what I want to know!
So it is true according to wep that haugaard as to play every game until the end of the season. That is absolute ridiculous
Who was the dickhead that sanctioned this deal? That’s what I want to know![/quote]
Not once, but twice.
So it is true according to wep that haugaard as to play every game until the end of the season. That is absolute ridiculous
Who was the dickhead that sanctioned this deal? That’s what I want to know![/quote]
Apparently it’s a common clause these days. It stop teams like us taking players on loan and then sitting them on the bench when they would have gained better experience elsewhere.And if you sign someone who your scouts have assured you is much better than anything you already have, why wouldn’t you be willing to accept a clause like that if it was the difference in getting the player you want or not getting him?
The one who needs to be questioned on this one is whoever scouted him and deemed him better than what we already had.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
