- This topic has 20 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Tit
Genius!
This is what I typed at the end of my original post…
I bet his response is a simple (pun intended) one-worder, probably either “prick” or “nob”
… but it didn’t display, presumably because I enclosed it in square brackets.
However, it’s good to see that your “I don’t know how to construct a proper counter-argument so I’ll just post shite” vocabulary is expanding.
Well, Ramis is out for a month now so it looks like we’re stuck with Kiernan and may see a return for Barnett. Also, Maloney remains available for Sat so how about:
Carson
Boyce Barnett Kiernan
Perch Maloney McCann Forshaw Taylor
Waghorn McLeanIt doesn’t look so bad on paper but as things stand is even weaker than at the start of the season
Well, Ramis is out for a month now so it looks like we’re stuck with Kiernan and may see a return for Barnett. Also, Maloney remains available for Sat so how about:Carson
Boyce Barnett Kiernan
Perch Maloney McCann Forshaw Taylor
Waghorn McLeanIt doesn’t look so bad on paper but as things stand is even weaker than at the start of the season
Looks reasonable that. However, I just have my doubts about Boyce running for a full game these days. His last few outings have seen him huffing and puffing at the 70 min mark and that is a dangerous period of the game to have a slow right back. Start him, yes, but he would have to come off sometime during the second half.
I would try this selection and formation with Waghorn and McLean supporting Fortune in the box when it is coming down the other side.
It will also allow Maloney and McCann to get forward in support when possible.Carson
Perch Barnett Rogne or Caldwell Taylor
Waghorn Maloney Forshaw McCann McLean
Fortune
Any of those formations, as long as we’ve got an attacking threat with the potential to out score an opponent which we need with our shaky defence. I think Ridgewell will most likely play
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
