› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › population percentages
- This topic has 21 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Mike.
-
AuthorPosts
-
2 December 2011 at 4:25 pm #75341
Anonymous
had the usual attendance argument at work so i set out to prove in theory we are quite well supported..
here are the results now they wont be 100% bang on as i have averaged out 3 differnet cencus results and also tried to add non prem teams within the vicinity of the teams…team population average attendace pecentage
arsenal 344924 60.045 17.60%
villa 485450 36.214 7.45%
bolton 261300 23.606 9.03%
blackburn 136.700 21.275 15.55%
chelsea 344924 35.739 10.36%
everton 512420 36739 7.17%
fulham 344924 22.279 6.46%
liverpool 512420 43563 8.5%
city 1122450 39.999 3.5%
utd 1122450 75.826 6.7%
newcastle 880.000 50686 5.7%
norwich 971900 24525 2.5%
qpr 344924 15.220 4.4%
swansea 270500 19000 7.02%
sunderlan 280800 31887 11.35%
stoke 362 400 24000 6.62%
tottenham 344924 41552 12.04%
west brom 236400 22000 9.3%
wolves 282800 23000 8.13%
wigan 301500 17500 5.8%heres the order of best percentage
arsenal
blACKBURN
totenham
sunderlND
chelsea
west brom
bolton
liverpool
wolves
villa
everton
swansea
utd
stoke
fulham
wigan
newcastle
qpr
city
norwichnot too bad for wigan also suprised by arsenal…
2 December 2011 at 4:53 pm #75342At least five of those would have better attendance if it weren’t for ground capacity.
Wigan’s population is misleading because the borough stretches from t’other end of Standish (almost Wiganers) to the far reaches of Astley (definitely not Wiganers) including another full blown town, Leigh, that hates Wigan with a vengeance.
I heard that the actual town of Wigan, rather than the borough, is around 90,000. How it’s arrived at I don’t know but if it is the case, we have a far higher percentage. Trying to explain this particular theory of relativity to the muppets that are always having a pop about our crowds is easier said than done.
2 December 2011 at 5:17 pm #75344Anonymous
i agree with that figure (90,000)ish….burnley is of similar size i think
2 December 2011 at 5:40 pm #75345Anonymous
population percentages my a*s* our attendances are piss poor for a prem club if whelan had kept the price low after our first season in the prem instead he took the route of sod em all i will fleece em all style of management and whacked the prices up,also martinez and his low scoring brand of football will keep people away.
2 December 2011 at 5:46 pm #75347Anonymous
and another one
2 December 2011 at 6:24 pm #75352Almost twice as many people in Norwich as in Liverpool? Is that right?
2 December 2011 at 8:12 pm #75358At least five of those would have better attendance if it weren’t for ground capacity.Wigan’s population is misleading because the borough stretches from t’other end of Standish (almost Wiganers) to the far reaches of Astley (definitely not Wiganers) including another full blown town, Leigh, that hates Wigan with a vengeance.
I heard that the actual town of Wigan, rather than the borough, is around 90,000. How it’s arrived at I don’t know but if it is the case, we have a far higher percentage. Trying to explain this particular theory of relativity to the muppets that are always having a pop about our crowds is easier said than done.
You heard? Who told you? We need names?
2 December 2011 at 8:25 pm #75360I heard that the actual town of Wigan, rather than the borough, is around 90,000. How it’s arrived at I don’t knowA couple of junctions off the M6 – one north of the town, one to the south – are good ways to arrive at the town of Wigan. ;)
2 December 2011 at 8:38 pm #75361I heard that the actual town of Wigan, rather than the borough, is around 90,000. How it’s arrived at I don’t know
A couple of junctions off the M6 – one north of the town, one to the south – are good ways to arrive at the town of Wigan. ;)[/quote]
Very clever goodpost
Edinburgh – Some bloke in a pub about 20 years ago. Flat cap, clogs, braces, drinking mild and smoking Park Drive. Can’t remember his name.
2 December 2011 at 9:47 pm #75367You heard? Who told you? We need names?Back away Edinburgh , there’s no conspiracy theories here for you.
Unless…………. oh my God , are you seriously suggesting that a rogue operator in the Office of National Statistics is deliberately fiddling the stats to make Latics have a smaller attendance to population ratio.
It sounds too mad to be true , but you never know. I’m in !!! :woohoo:
3 December 2011 at 12:00 am #75376Almost twice as many people in Norwich as in Liverpool? Is that right?They tend to count them twice in Norwich, when in actual fact spouse, sibling, and cousin on a Norwich census is one and the same person.
Also, as census returns are probably never received in Liverpool, one would have to assume that most household consist of one parent families, with at least one brown child.
Hope this helps.
3 December 2011 at 3:38 am #75388Almost twice as many people in Norwich as in Liverpool? Is that right?
They tend to count them twice in Norwich, when in actual fact spouse, sibling, and cousin on a Norwich census is one and the same person.
Also, as census returns are probably never received in Liverpool, one would have to assume that most household consist of one parent families, with at least one brown child.
Hope this helps.[/quote]
…we can’t forget that in Norwich they also have twice as many fingers to count on as well……playing havoc with their statistics.
….I don’t know maybe now they have finally come to their census.
Oh f&ck*ng dear….I’m sorry…..it’s late and I’m saving my attention for our glorious win tomorrow.
C’MON WIGAN
will be my shout as usual………..and as LOUD.
We will prevail.
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
3 December 2011 at 4:11 am #75390Almost twice as many people in Norwich as in Liverpool? Is that right?
They tend to count them twice in Norwich, when in actual fact spouse, sibling, and cousin on a Norwich census is one and the same person.
Also, as census returns are probably never received in Liverpool, one would have to assume that most household consist of one parent families, with at least one brown child.
Hope this helps.[/quote]
…we can’t forget that in Norwich they also have twice as many fingers to count on as well……playing havoc with their statistics.
….I don’t know maybe now they have finally come to their census.
Oh f&ck*ng dear….I’m sorry…..it’s late and I’m saving my attention for our glorious win tomorrow.
C’MON WIGAN
will be my shout as usual………..and as LOUD.
We will prevail.
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:[/quote]
As I asked Rodbomb earlier If he was James C I do feel compelled to ask you are you Griff? . Rodbombs answer was unsatisfactory in my eyes as he said he had heard that he went to live in Tenerife but we all know he came back again and was seeing some bird from Reading who he had met over there. I know this because he rammed it down anybody who would listen’s throat’s on here. It was made out by him that he and said Girlfriend was the best couple since Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor. Probably split up long ago since then and it was a wet behind the ears 20 year old lad’s silliness just coming out.I ask this because this was asked the other week by another poster and the only reason why anybody’s karma rating on here would go back up is if they bumped it back up with one of their other incarnations on here. We all know John as a Multi on here and it’s tediously boring and deeply unfunny!
what i mean is Griff and Micky C?
3 December 2011 at 4:20 am #75391Jeff, I am going to show you some pictures and I want you to tell me the first thing that comes into your mind for each one !!
3 December 2011 at 4:24 am #75392Almost twice as many people in Norwich as in Liverpool? Is that right?
They tend to count them twice in Norwich, when in actual fact spouse, sibling, and cousin on a Norwich census is one and the same person.
Also, as census returns are probably never received in Liverpool, one would have to assume that most household consist of one parent families, with at least one brown child.
Hope this helps.[/quote]
…we can’t forget that in Norwich they also have twice as many fingers to count on as well……playing havoc with their statistics.
….I don’t know maybe now they have finally come to their census.
Oh f&ck*ng dear….I’m sorry…..it’s late and I’m saving my attention for our glorious win tomorrow.
C’MON WIGAN
will be my shout as usual………..and as LOUD.
We will prevail.
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:[/quote]
As I asked Rodbomb earlier If he was James C I do feel compelled to ask you are you Griff? . Rodbombs answer was unsatisfactory in my eyes as he said he had heard that he went to live in Tenerife but we all know he came back again and was seeing some bird from Reading who he had met over there. I know this because he rammed it down anybody who would listen’s throat’s on here. It was made out by him that he and said Girlfriend was the best couple since Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor. Probably split up long ago since then and it was a wet behind the ears 20 year old lad’s silliness just coming out.I ask this because this was asked the other week by another poster and the only reason why anybody’s karma rating on here would go back up is if they bumped it back up with one of their other incarnations on here. We all know John as a Multi on here and it’s tediously boring and deeply unfunny!
what i mean is Griff and Micky C?[/quote]
Mrs Micky likes to run her fingers through my hair…….
BOB……we have the craic…….pretending to be Griff is not part of that.
I’ve a better book in me than that….. ;)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › population percentages