- This topic has 9 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Said wigan had a bigger and better squad. He should have added but they have a shitter.manager whose not a clue what to do with them
Or a poor excuse from saggy chops when having total posession they couldn’t do feck all with it depite there players being on probably twice as much as our players
It’s Redknapp’s way of telling the owner he hasn’t squandered enough of his money yet and wants even more. Without doubt the most overrated manager in the country.
It’s Redknapp’s way of telling the owner he hasn’t squandered enough of his money yet and wants even more. Without doubt the most overrated manager in the country.Having read the preview of the OP, I was just about to post the exact same thing.
Overated..maybe. But bet we would be better off than we are now if he was in charge of usNot financially we wouldn’t.
Overated..maybe. But bet we would be better off than we are now if he was in charge of us
Not financially we wouldn’t.[/quote]
Why??
Like every manager the world over, Harry Redknapp only spends money & claims wages that his chairman tell him he can spend/claim. Its not as if he buys all these players behind the owners backs without them knowing about it.
Likewise, if he was in charge of Latics he would only be able to spend what Dave Whelan told him he could spend. Just like Coyle does.As it happens I doubt he’d ever be at Latics as he wouldn’t take the pay or accept those budget restrictions but if he was Latics would be in no better or worse financial position than they are now
Overated..maybe. But bet we would be better off than we are now if he was in charge of us
Not financially we wouldn’t.[/quote]
Why??
Like every manager the world over, Harry Redknapp only spends money & claims wages that his chairman tell him he can spend/claim. Its not as if he buys all these players behind the owners backs without them knowing about it.
Likewise, if he was in charge of Latics he would only be able to spend what Dave Whelan told him he could spend. Just like Coyle does.As it happens I doubt he’d ever be at Latics as he wouldn’t take the pay or accept those budget restrictions but if he was Latics would be in no better or worse financial position than they are now[/quote]
And now you’ve wound your neck in and stepped off your soapbox…Because if he was manager, in order to attract him to the club we’d have been paying a much higher salary than we are doing for Owen Coyle’s services.
You get what you pay for. Simple as that.
Wouldn’t want Redknapp anywhere near our club, first opportunity for more money he’d be off, QPR in relegation trouble he signs a defender who admits he isn’t fit, not to mention how expensive his wages would be. and what he would want to pay players. He’s bankrupted almost every club he’s been at, spent millions and done very little as a manager in the game.
No thanks
Although I agree, I wouldn’t want Redknapp near our club, he is right saying we have a stronger and deeper squad. We have a team that bar injuries to Caldwell, Ramis and other defenders, would have stayed up last season and a team that won the FA cup….now we have a stronger team, cant string passes together, hoof it around and are mid table fodder…its deeply shocking and if anyone can defend that, well, I will be amazed!
Should never have appointed Coyle as Manager (Director of football maybe ;) ), I will always support my team through thick and thin…but I can’t say the same about the Manager.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
