- This topic has 21 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I’m a bit confused by Rosler’s press conference. He said that he wants to play like Martinez but also intends to adopt a 4-3-3. He also said he likes the look of McClean and McManaman.
As far as I can see, you can’t square these things. You can’t play wing backs, like Martinez, with a back four. And you wouldn’t play two wingers with two wing backs.
So what does everyone think his first team will look like? I’m guessing something like:
Carson
Boyce Barnett Ramis Perch
Watson McArthur Gomez
McManaman Holt Powell
That seems a reasonable choice. I’m sure that he can get the players to produce more than Coyle could.
He seems to be giving the Championship game against Bolton priority, so the Maribor team will be different.
The Championship race is very close, so every game matters. There is little opportunity to experiment until the MK Dons game. And I’m sure that we’d all like a good cup run.
I’m a bit confused by Rosler’s press conference. He said that he wants to play like Martinez but also intends to adopt a 4-3-3. He also said he likes the look of McClean and McManaman.As far as I can see, you can’t square these things. You can’t play wing backs, like Martinez, with a back four. And you wouldn’t play two wingers with two wing backs.
So what does everyone think his first team will look like? I’m guessing something like:
Carson
Boyce Barnett Ramis Perch
Watson McArthur Gomez
McManaman Holt Powell
Fairdos that but I would swap Shotton for Boyce at the back with Rogne as back-up on the bench. and would swap beausajour for watson in midfield for his industry and energy – i like gomez in the middle as he can be creative.
Carson
boyce ramis barnett beusejour
Mac powell roger
macman holt mcleanattack attack attack
lose lose lose ;)
Well as Holt is apparently still in the UK “getting Fitter/Fatter* it’s back to the drawing board chaps !!
* = delete as appropriate.
Hasn’t our recent run of form and defensive lapses coincided with Ramis’s return? I’d start with Rogne.
When Bob first came to us he played 4-3-3 with 2 wingers cutting in off the wing to support the main striker. No wing backs to be seen.
A back four is an alternative to a back three plus wingbacks.
But Martinez’ style is to keep possession. That can be applied whichever formation is adopted.
A back four is an alternative to a back three plus wingbacks.But Martinez’ style is to keep possession. That can be applied whichever formation is adopted.
In the words of Meatloaf.. “It must have been when you were kissing me”
Carson
boyce ramis barnett beusejour
Mac powell roger
macman holt mcleanattack attack attack
lose lose lose ;)[/quote]
Hmm I bet you’d rather watch my team that some of the dross lineups coyle came up with.
I may compromise and put perch in at lb and Gomez is pushing Powell for a place if he doesn’t cut out the primadonna act.
Carson
boyce ramis barnett beusejour
Mac powell roger
macman holt mcleanattack attack attack
lose lose lose ;)[/quote]
Hmm I bet you’d rather watch my team that some of the dross lineups coyle came up with.
I may compromise and put perch in at lb and Gomez is pushing Powell for a place if he doesn’t cut out the primadonna act.[/quote]
I would indeed, and I’m glad somebody else agrees with me about Powell
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
