› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Scott Sinclair
- This topic has 9 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by Adrian Fletcher.
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 September 2010 at 3:25 pm #47345
Scored a Hat-Trick for Swansea during mid week…How come he didn’t do that for us?
25 September 2010 at 4:47 pm #47359Let’s hope he doesn’t do it again :(
25 September 2010 at 4:51 pm #47360Scored a Hat-Trick for Swansea during mid week…How come he didn’t do that for us?Clue: He hardly ever played.
25 September 2010 at 7:05 pm #47365Scored a Hat-Trick for Swansea during mid week…How come he didn’t do that for us?This post is so stupid I don’t know where to begin. What a ridiculous question.
To name a couple he didn’t have a lot of chances at Wigan and he is also now playing at a lower level :roll:
28 September 2010 at 11:16 am #47532Never got a chance because our manager insisted on playing his best centre forward on the wing, taking a place he could have had.
28 September 2010 at 1:36 pm #47540Never got a chance because our manager insisted on playing his best centre forward on the wing, taking a place he could have had.He never got a chance because he wasn’t good enough for the PL.
He is 21 and made his debut in January 2007.
He is currently playing for his 8th club. He has started just 38 games in nearly 4 years, including one start for us.
Hopefully for the lad Swansea might just be the making of him.28 September 2010 at 4:38 pm #47548He never got a chance because he wasn’t good enough for the PL.
He is 21 and made his debut in January 2007.
He is currently playing for his 8th club. He has started just 38 games in nearly 4 years, including one start for us.
Hopefully for the lad Swansea might just be the making of him.Can’t agree with that. How does anyone know if he’s good enough for the Prem – he’s never been given a chance to prove himself, particularly at Latics.
I don’t blame him for going to Swansea rather than coming back to Latics or staying at Chelsea – at least he’ll get a game there
28 September 2010 at 4:43 pm #47549He never got a chance because he wasn’t good enough for the PL.
He is 21 and made his debut in January 2007.
He is currently playing for his 8th club. He has started just 38 games in nearly 4 years, including one start for us.
Hopefully for the lad Swansea might just be the making of him.Can’t agree with that. How does anyone know if he’s good enough for the Prem – he’s never been given a chance to prove himself, particularly at Latics.
I don’t blame him for going to Swansea rather than coming back to Latics or staying at Chelsea – at least he’ll get a game there
Have to agree with you there. Had he been given a chance I think he may have been decent. Don’t see why Martinez wouldn’t attempt to sign him when he was so cheap and has that much potential.
28 September 2010 at 6:30 pm #47554He has spent enough time at clubs for each manager to assess whether he was good enough or not.
Swansea 09-08-2010 £ 500000 6 (0)
Wigan 06-08-2009 to 01-06-2010 Loan 1 (17)
Birmingham 06-01-2009 to 25-05-2009 Loan 8 (6)
C Palace 27-03-2008 to 14-05-2008 Loan 6 (0)
Charlton 28-02-2008 to 26-03-2008 Loan 0 (3)
QPR 06-11-2007 to 16-12-2007 Loan 8 (1) 0
Plymouth 21-01-2007 to 07-05-2007 Loan 8 (7)
Chelsea 06-01-2007 to 09-08-2010 Youth 1 (4)38 appearances and 37 as sub in nearly 4 years.
16 weeks at Plymouth, 8 games
6 weeks at QPR, 8 games
4 weeks at Charlton, 0 games
6 weeks at Palace, 6 games
11 weeks at Birmingham, 8 games
48 weeks at Wigan, 1 game
100+ weeks at Chelsea in between his loans, 1 game.He is still young, and could yet turn out to be okay.
Swansea have taken a chance on him, and for £500,000 its got to be worth a punt at that level.
He needs the games to give him confidence and Martinez probably realised that we were carrying enough players of that ilk , and decided against signing him.28 September 2010 at 8:49 pm #47571Don’t think your facts quite match your point there.
He’s been a young player at Chelsea. Like so many other young English lads at the big clubs he hasn’t had a cat in hells chance of getting anywhere near their first team. He gets shipped out on loan all over the place. Managers there don’t have to “assess if he’s good enough or not” – they just want to fill a gap for a couple of months.
He ends up with us. Our manager decides he wants a right footed centre forward on the left, even though we don’t have a centre forward worthy of the name in his place. He doesn’t get a chance.
Ends up at Swansea with his best years of development time at the top level: ages 18-21 behind him. He’ll never be the player he might have been.
Scott Sinclairs career so far is the epitome of all thats wrong with English football, as shown in the World Cup. If he’d been German, maybe, just maybe he may be an international regular by now.
On the other hand, he may be a terrible trainer with a bad attitude. Or never quite up to it. My point is, we have no idea of that from what we’ve seen at Latics.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Scott Sinclair