› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Sin Bins
- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 5 months ago by BB.
-
AuthorPosts
-
5 December 2013 at 8:40 pm #124409
Do one platini yer clown !!
5 December 2013 at 11:19 pm #124414Personally I think it’s a good idea.
Obviously it would be less frequent than current yellow cards (but when I were a lad bookings were rare anyway), but it would at least penalise someone in the game they had committed the offence, rather than now where someone commits a foul against us that prevents a goal, and then due to totting up gets banned from a game next week against our biggest rivals. THAT doesn’t make sense.
6 December 2013 at 2:01 am #124420Kin ell man with some of these refs it’ll end up 5-aside. And what happens when the goalie gets Sin Binned ?
6 December 2013 at 2:06 am #124421I did say it would have to be less frequently used than current yellow cards, but as for what happens when/if a goalie gets sin-binned – well he just has to make sure he doesn’t get sin-binned, doesn’t he?
6 December 2013 at 2:33 am #124422Personally I think it’s a good idea.Obviously it would be less frequent than current yellow cards (but when I were a lad bookings were rare anyway), but it would at least penalise someone in the game they had committed the offence, rather than now where someone commits a foul against us that prevents a goal, and then due to totting up gets banned from a game next week against our biggest rivals. THAT doesn’t make sense.
The game is already rife with divers and play actors trying to con refs and win dodgy decisions. GL, would this idea not make matters worse if a player knows he can possibly get an opponent binned for part of the game?. Imagine United are losing Ashley Young takes to the field, Bambi on ice.
No not for me, another belter from the office of Sepp Blatter and his band of performing idiots.
6 December 2013 at 4:13 am #124424Personally I think it’s a good idea.
Obviously it would be less frequent than current yellow cards (but when I were a lad bookings were rare anyway), but it would at least penalise someone in the game they had committed the offence, rather than now where someone commits a foul against us that prevents a goal, and then due to totting up gets banned from a game next week against our biggest rivals. THAT doesn’t make sense.
agreed refs a ref let him get on with it,what goes around comes around.
The game is already rife with divers and play actors trying to con refs and win dodgy decisions. GL, would this idea not make matters worse if a player knows he can possibly get an opponent binned for part of the game?. Imagine United are losing Ashley Young takes to the field, Bambi on ice.
No not for me, another belter from the office of Sepp Blatter and his band of performing idiots.[/quote]
6 December 2013 at 2:54 pm #124440No way. Referees don’t know what they’re doing as it is with just three alternatives – foul, yellow card foul + red card foul. Throw another alternative in and it will be bedlam.
They’ve already turned it into a non contact sport – stop meddling!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Sin Bins