- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Thought they were supposed to be impartial? Seen our match report?
Wigan ratings 5,6’s United’s 7,8,9’s. A supposed vintage Manchester United performance. Apparently according to the skysports article they comfortably went in 1-0 at half time after dominating the first half, despite Wigan having 3 times as many shots and Rooneys challenge being ok. Goes into in depth talk about all Uniteds chances and a small sentence about ours.
Then you click that persons twitter link. You notice it’s a glory hunter Manchester United girl fan from Doncaster.
So I made a comment asking why such a biased impartial article. Needless to say the stupid cow didn’t let the comment be published. Surprise, surprise.
It’s irrelevant to talk about affecting our performances, pointless comment.
It’s simply pointing out media bias, from a company which is supposed to be impartial and represent teams with equality, which it clearly isn’t doing.
Just like referee’s should be neutral not allowing Clattenburg who’s an avid Manchester United fan, as it clouds their judgement. A Manchester United fan should not be writing a match article on a neutral sports website.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
