- This topic has 37 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
From a previous thread, “I knew about it being used for possesion but was quite adamant that there was no need for one to be there.. Not actually sure why.”
I’ll give you one thing James, you’re very thick skinned.
From a previous thread, “I knew about it being used for possesion but was quite adamant that there was no need for one to be there.. Not actually sure why.”I’ll give you one thing James, you’re very thick skinned.
Why? I knew as soon as Garswood pointed it to me that I had done it wrong.. I just didn’t spot it when looking for a mistake.
Anyway why don’t you keep to your own conversations..peace has been made. Weps.
From a previous thread, “I knew about it being used for possesion but was quite adamant that there was no need for one to be there.. Not actually sure why.”
I’ll give you one thing James, you’re very thick skinned.
Why? I knew as soon as Garswood pointed it to me that I had done it wrong.. I just didn’t spot it when looking for a mistake.
Anyway why don’t you keep to your own conversations..peace has been made. Weps.[/quote]
I also know things when they’ve been pointed out to me.It’s not that I didn’t KNOW… It’s that I didn’t SPOT it when looking back… Get it?..I think you are digging yourself a bigger hole here James.
Stop trying to be smart correcting other people’s grammar when, by your own admission, you don’t fully understand it yourself.
It’s not that I didn’t KNOW… It’s that I didn’t SPOT it when looking back… Get it?..
I think you are digging yourself a bigger hole here James.
Stop trying to be smart correcting other people’s grammar when, by your own admission, you don’t fully understand it yourself.[/quote]
I do fully understand it. I only correct peoples grammar when i see a mistake. Just let it drop, what has it got to do with you? Please don’t answer that, I don’t care.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
