- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Whilst this has been brought up, why do we need three keepers for at the most 7 games?
Worst case scenario i suppose, I think i would prefer it with 3 as opposed to 2
Think its FIFA rules, of 23 players, 3 have to be goalkeepers.Correct
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/may/26/world-cup-2010-three-goalkeepersThe 3 keepers we’re going to take aren’t injury prone, I think we shouldn’t take Hart.Hart is the best of the 3…Wish he would come to wigan! James being 2nd best and Green not being very good.
The 3 keepers we’re going to take aren’t injury prone, I think we shouldn’t take Hart.
Hart is the best of the 3…Wish he would come to wigan! James being 2nd best and Green not being very good.[/quote]
For England there all pretty good, Hart has almost no expreience.The 3 keepers we’re going to take aren’t injury prone, I think we shouldn’t take Hart.
Hart is the best of the 3…Wish he would come to wigan! James being 2nd best and Green not being very good.[/quote]
For England there all pretty good, Hart has almost no expreience.[/quote]Hart seems unphased by it though, and played well every time I have seen him.
Hart is the best of the 3…Wish he would come to wigan! James being 2nd best and Green not being very good.[/quote]
For England there all pretty good, Hart has almost no expreience.[/quote]Hart seems unphased by it though, and played well every time I have seen him.[/quote]
Can’t say that about Bainsey thoughCan’t say that about Bainsey thoughHe didn’t say anything about Bainesey though, or have I missed something :?
I agree though, Hart should be No.1, and out of the three going, has had by far the best season.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
