› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Totally undeserved
- This topic has 15 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 11 months ago by Zeb2.
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 May 2014 at 8:57 pm #131455
Lucky lucky QPR can’t believe it
24 May 2014 at 9:02 pm #131456Shit defending.Why not just take it to extra time with a minute to go,n then go for them as they tire.
24 May 2014 at 9:36 pm #131458Why be bothered?
Best result for us is them going up. One with money out of the way for next yr.
Fulham are in a mess, no players. Norwich will not do well and will have their fella sacked by Christmas. Cardiff, no comment.We’ll be next seasons Leicester, get on us early
24 May 2014 at 10:12 pm #131459Lucky lucky QPR can’t believe itSpot on Vince, they rode their luck again did QPR and did to Derby what they did yo us. Defend and counter, hope they get relegated again next season.
24 May 2014 at 11:45 pm #131460I wish it was us, I would be more than happy being a yoyo team picking up the big bucks then relegation its shit or bust for us next season. If QPR didn’t go up this season it would have been the end of them .
25 May 2014 at 12:59 pm #131462Whether you think Qpr were lucky or not it proves again the importance of having a quality striker .Zamora came on against us and made the difference ,laying on both goals ,holding the ball up superbly and then firing the winner yesterday.We all know the difficulty in aquiring a goal getter but this must be our main investment.
25 May 2014 at 2:36 pm #131463Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.
QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
25 May 2014 at 4:07 pm #131464QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.Now that is a good stat!
25 May 2014 at 5:09 pm #131465Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.
25 May 2014 at 5:25 pm #131466Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.
QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]
They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.
And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry!
25 May 2014 at 8:17 pm #131468Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.
QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]
They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.
And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]
But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.
Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.
25 May 2014 at 8:30 pm #131469Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.
QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]
They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.
And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]
But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.
Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.[/quote]
I do generally agree with you, but the problem as I see it is that rules had to start from a base point and because of the way that accounts are prepared there was always the possibility that a club could take that gamble until the first checkpoint. I think a £50m fine is a fair old punishment, well deserved mind you.
I like your idea about the points deduction. I’m no lawyer but I reckon that part of the problem might be the fact that the FL and PL are different competitions/organisations which might muddy the waters on points deductions.
And whilst Harry picked the players, nobody forced the owners to write the cheques. As much as I don’t like him, I can’t see that he personally has done too much ;)
25 May 2014 at 8:41 pm #131470Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.
QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.
I wouldn’t call it luck.
You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]
They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.
And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]
But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.
Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.[/quote]
I do generally agree with you, but the problem as I see it is that rules had to start from a base point and because of the way that accounts are prepared there was always the possibility that a club could take that gamble until the first checkpoint. I think a £50m fine is a fair old punishment, well deserved mind you.
I like your idea about the points deduction. I’m no lawyer but I reckon that part of the problem might be the fact that the FL and PL are different competitions/organisations which might muddy the waters on points deductions.
And whilst Harry picked the players, nobody forced the owners to write the cheques. As much as I don’t like him, I can’t see that he personally has done too much ;)[/quote]
You make a good point on the different organisations as I read somewhere that QPR are no longer part of the Football League Association and the Premier League have decided they won’t withhold any money in order to help the football league claim any fine – so where does that now leave them. I suspect there are some very hungry lawyers around waiting in the wings to jump all over the legality of it all.
I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.
25 May 2014 at 8:52 pm #131471I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.I was lucky enough to be in the Director’s box at White Hart Lane when we played them there a couple of seasons ago. Harry had come straight from his court case to be at the game and acknowledged the crowd before he took his seat. I commented (not that quietly, funnily enough) that he was doing well to clap with those handcuffs on. Well, it amused me. I turned round to see that it didn’t amuse the three blokes sat right behind me. They were Les Ferdinand, Tim Sherwood and… Jamie Redknapp!
26 May 2014 at 12:26 am #131474I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.
I was lucky enough to be in the Director’s box at White Hart Lane when we played them there a couple of seasons ago. Harry had come straight from his court case to be at the game and acknowledged the crowd before he took his seat. I commented (not that quietly, funnily enough) that he was doing well to clap with those handcuffs on. Well, it amused me. I turned round to see that it didn’t amuse the three blokes sat right behind me. They were Les Ferdinand, Tim Sherwood and… Jamie Redknapp![/quote]
I wonder how many times unfashionable hoops will be on tv next year ?
One thing I noticed also was how long faced Humphrey cushion looked when the final whistle went which was surprising given the prize they had just won.
Rumours were abound that he was out if he lost the game so I presume he would have been entitled to a pay off and then a quick swerve across the city to Tottenham Sackspur or West hoof .
At least we don’t have to play this dreadfully dull side for a bit at least . -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Totally undeserved