Totally undeserved

Forums Latics Crazy Forum Totally undeserved

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #131455
    vincehillvinceHill
    Player

      Lucky lucky QPR can’t believe it

      #131456
      xxxxxmick
      Player

        Shit defending.Why not just take it to extra time with a minute to go,n then go for them as they tire.

        #131458
        Tez HTerry Hill
        Player

          Why be bothered?

          Best result for us is them going up. One with money out of the way for next yr.
          Fulham are in a mess, no players. Norwich will not do well and will have their fella sacked by Christmas. Cardiff, no comment.

          We’ll be next seasons Leicester, get on us early

          #131459
          jimmycjimmyc
          Player
            Lucky lucky QPR can’t believe it

            Spot on Vince, they rode their luck again did QPR and did to Derby what they did yo us. Defend and counter, hope they get relegated again next season.

            #131460
            grumpygrumpy
            Player

              I wish it was us, I would be more than happy being a yoyo team picking up the big bucks then relegation its shit or bust for us next season. If QPR didn’t go up this season it would have been the end of them .

              #131462
              MR BrownbillMR Brownbill
              Player

                Whether you think Qpr were lucky or not it proves again the importance of having a quality striker .Zamora came on against us and made the difference ,laying on both goals ,holding the ball up superbly and then firing the winner yesterday.We all know the difficulty in aquiring a goal getter but this must be our main investment.

                #131463
                DoglaticDoglatic
                Player

                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  #131464
                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  Now that is a good stat!

                  #131465
                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.

                  #131466

                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]

                  They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.

                  And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry!

                  #131468

                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]

                  They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.

                  And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]

                  But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.

                  Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.

                  #131469

                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]

                  They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.

                  And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]

                  But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.

                  Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.[/quote]

                  I do generally agree with you, but the problem as I see it is that rules had to start from a base point and because of the way that accounts are prepared there was always the possibility that a club could take that gamble until the first checkpoint. I think a £50m fine is a fair old punishment, well deserved mind you.

                  I like your idea about the points deduction. I’m no lawyer but I reckon that part of the problem might be the fact that the FL and PL are different competitions/organisations which might muddy the waters on points deductions.

                  And whilst Harry picked the players, nobody forced the owners to write the cheques. As much as I don’t like him, I can’t see that he personally has done too much ;)

                  #131470

                  Was hoping they would lose, but they held on and were clinical enough to take their chance when it came.

                  QPR’s team had more than 4,000 Premier League games under their belt, while Derby had less than 200.

                  I wouldn’t call it luck.

                  You’re right, it wasn’t luck – just look at the players they had at their disposal. Now this brings another slant on how they have played (cough) their way through the championship – I am no accountant, however, if one were to look at QPRs financial outlay over the past 12 months or so I am sure they wouldn’t pass the criteria/due dilligence set out by the ‘financial fair play system’. The owner and Redknapp have flagrantly abused the system. Better teams than QPR (and I include ourselves here) deserve to be in the Premiership before these spendthrifts. How they have been allowed to get away with it beggars belief – oh hang on, it’s our ‘Good ‘ol Arry innit’.[/quote]

                  They haven’t got away with it though, have they? They are about to be hit with a £50m fine. I know that’s no consolation to Derby or anyone else, but the FFP rules had to have some time to kick in and it looks as if they, like City, are being pulled up at the earliest opportunity – as far as the rules allow.

                  And, as I think Tyldesley has said, it’s the owners who sign the cheques, not Harry![/quote]

                  But they have ‘got away with it’. They have maneuvered themselves into the Prem by flagrantly breaking the FFP rules – the fine is neither here nor there to the owners. They are there because, in effect, they have cheated – cheated other teams who have stuck to the rules and have not been able to match their spending power. The fine will be paid but QPR will still get the world wide exposure that comes from being in the Prem (and the side business that comes with it). Now if they were to be deducted, say 20, points then that would be a real deterrent to others thinking that they too could get away with it – just my opinion like.

                  Oh! and the owners might sign the cheques but they don’t pick the players to sign do they, that’s Redknaps job.[/quote]

                  I do generally agree with you, but the problem as I see it is that rules had to start from a base point and because of the way that accounts are prepared there was always the possibility that a club could take that gamble until the first checkpoint. I think a £50m fine is a fair old punishment, well deserved mind you.

                  I like your idea about the points deduction. I’m no lawyer but I reckon that part of the problem might be the fact that the FL and PL are different competitions/organisations which might muddy the waters on points deductions.

                  And whilst Harry picked the players, nobody forced the owners to write the cheques. As much as I don’t like him, I can’t see that he personally has done too much ;)[/quote]

                  You make a good point on the different organisations as I read somewhere that QPR are no longer part of the Football League Association and the Premier League have decided they won’t withhold any money in order to help the football league claim any fine – so where does that now leave them. I suspect there are some very hungry lawyers around waiting in the wings to jump all over the legality of it all.

                  I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.

                  #131471
                  I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.

                  I was lucky enough to be in the Director’s box at White Hart Lane when we played them there a couple of seasons ago. Harry had come straight from his court case to be at the game and acknowledged the crowd before he took his seat. I commented (not that quietly, funnily enough) that he was doing well to clap with those handcuffs on. Well, it amused me. I turned round to see that it didn’t amuse the three blokes sat right behind me. They were Les Ferdinand, Tim Sherwood and… Jamie Redknapp!

                  #131474
                  vincehillvinceHill
                  Player

                    I’m sorry but I’m not for letting Redknapp off so easily as you. He has been involved with some dubious deals in the past and, to me, he definitely was the instrument behind the squad and their wage bill.

                    I was lucky enough to be in the Director’s box at White Hart Lane when we played them there a couple of seasons ago. Harry had come straight from his court case to be at the game and acknowledged the crowd before he took his seat. I commented (not that quietly, funnily enough) that he was doing well to clap with those handcuffs on. Well, it amused me. I turned round to see that it didn’t amuse the three blokes sat right behind me. They were Les Ferdinand, Tim Sherwood and… Jamie Redknapp![/quote]

                    I wonder how many times unfashionable hoops will be on tv next year ?
                    One thing I noticed also was how long faced Humphrey cushion looked when the final whistle went which was surprising given the prize they had just won.
                    Rumours were abound that he was out if he lost the game so I presume he would have been entitled to a pay off and then a quick swerve across the city to Tottenham Sackspur or West hoof .
                    At least we don’t have to play this dreadfully dull side for a bit at least .

                  Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
                  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                  Forums Latics Crazy Forum Totally undeserved