- This topic has 13 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
It seems that our fixtures clash with the lodgers in september if they carry on and finish top of the league (and win nowt) should we expect demos and pie bans again ?
Rogues Gallery
Gold RLFANS Member
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 12:07 pm
Posts: 17513
Play off first round
Saturday, 11th September 2010
Wigan Athletic v SunderlandPlay off second round
Saturday, 18 September 2010
Wigan Athletic v Man. CityIt seems that our fixtures clash with the lodgers in september if they carry on and finish top of the league (and win nowt) should we expect demos and pie bans again ?Rogues Gallery
Gold RLFANS Member
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 12:07 pm
Posts: 17513
Play off first round
Saturday, 11th September 2010
Wigan Athletic v SunderlandPlay off second round
Saturday, 18 September 2010
Wigan Athletic v Man. CityNow theres more than 1 reason I don’t want them to win the league ;)
I’m thinking certain person’s off CL are trying to stir the hornets nest over on Cherryandwhite :lol:
Whndid he get banned ??
the other day? he called landgate a mong . I had said that Sunderland had spent 62 million in 3 seasons on players were as the tics had spent 1.3 million after player sales.he was disrespectful to landgate before my post and then landgate posted saying with a wink that he had heard that he (mutty white dog)was holidaying with vat now?. you posted on the thread 32 and I thought you knew what had gone on? ……..happy days :lol:
the other day? he called landgate a mong . I had said that Sunderland had spent 62 million in 3 seasons on players were as the tics had spent 1.3 million after player sales.he was disrespectful to landgate before my post and then landgate posted saying with a wink that he had heard that he (mutty white dog)was holidaying with vat now?. you posted on the thread 32 and I thought you knew what had gone on? ……..happy days :lol:Did I get banned? I never noticed.
the other day? he called landgate a mong . I had said that Sunderland had spent 62 million in 3 seasons on players were as the tics had spent 1.3 million after player sales.he was disrespectful to landgate before my post and then landgate posted saying with a wink that he had heard that he (mutty white dog)was holidaying with vat now?. you posted on the thread 32 and I thought you knew what had gone on? ……..happy days :lol:
Did I get banned? I never noticed.[/quote]
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Next time will be permanent!
:shock: :shock:
the other day? he called landgate a mong . I had said that Sunderland had spent 62 million in 3 seasons on players were as the tics had spent 1.3 million after player sales.he was disrespectful to landgate before my post and then landgate posted saying with a wink that he had heard that he (mutty white dog)was holidaying with vat now?. you posted on the thread 32 and I thought you knew what had gone on? ……..happy days :lol:
Did I get banned? I never noticed.[/quote]
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Next time will be permanent![/quote]
Well, if I was banned for that, then someone a couple of threads up should have been banned as well.
Or is it one rule for one….
the other day? he called landgate a mong . I had said that Sunderland had spent 62 million in 3 seasons on players were as the tics had spent 1.3 million after player sales.he was disrespectful to landgate before my post and then landgate posted saying with a wink that he had heard that he (mutty white dog)was holidaying with vat now?. you posted on the thread 32 and I thought you knew what had gone on? ……..happy days :lol:
Did I get banned? I never noticed.[/quote]
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Next time will be permanent![/quote]
Get Him Potted for good,He wont be missed,aswell it gives Him more time to pen push for our Armed Forces,never seen any action that mon :roll: :roll: :roll:
Hornets nest stirring mon :D
if we’re thrown out again we need some serious protesting organising rather than just people spouting their mouths off and being all talk and no trousers on ere, sayin they’ll protest, but then doing sweet FA like last time
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Dummy’s are out again Coley’s 2 match ban missing the Big One (2)
This was a very serious matter which had the potential for injury. It did in fact cause a significant injury which led to your opponent leaving the field. We think that the referee got it absolutely right in his decision to dismiss you and dealt with the situation very well. We accept this was not a deliberate action but very reckless. We give you credit for pleading guilty however this was direct, high contact with the head of your opponent. The credit for pleading guilty is balanced out by your previous record which includes a recent suspension and warnings.
Suspension 2 matches
Fine £300
Warning
RL picking on them again. :lol: :lol: :lol:Dummy’s are out again Coley’s 2 match ban missing the Big One (2)
This was a very serious matter which had the potential for injury. It did in fact cause a significant injury which led to your opponent leaving the field. We think that the referee got it absolutely right in his decision to dismiss you and dealt with the situation very well. We accept this was not a deliberate action but very reckless. We give you credit for pleading guilty however this was direct, high contact with the head of your opponent. The credit for pleading guilty is balanced out by your previous record which includes a recent suspension and warnings.
Suspension 2 matches
Fine £300
Warning
RL picking on them again. :lol: :lol: :lol:Reminds me of that song many moons back, :roll: :roll: :roll: Why is everybody always picking on me, :lol: :lol: :lol:
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
