No, I think it WAS genuine.
Just back-tracking now for legal reasons.[/quote]
Yeah because when you are back tracking for legal reasons the best course of action is to immediately accept liability in written form even though you have no reason to doubt the information you had in the first place was anything other than genuine.[/quote]
It was a fake. Papers don’t backtrack unless they’re suitably red faced.
It’s even disappeared from the Mail Online.