- This topic has 13 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
in the 1950 World Cup Finals.
There is a reason that FIFA would not let India play in the 1950 World Cup Finals, forcing them to withdraw, what the devil was that reason?
Because everytime they got a corner they opened a shop on it !! ;)Every throw-in brought in a hotdog salesman
Sadly, I think I know this…..didn’t the Indians want to play bare-footed and Fifa refused to allow them to?
is it something to do with john wayne or calamity jane and them shooting arrows at stage coaches or scalping man with forked tongue :?: :?: :?:
Sadly, I think I know this…..didn’t the Indians want to play bare-footed and Fifa refused to allow them to?That was my answer too
You not having a go at my nickname quiz Garswood ?The ones I knew have been answered :(
I knew the footballer, boxer and golfer, and I knew vaguely who the swimmer (or why he was famous at least) was but couldn’t for the life of me tell you his name, and if you’d asked even less could I have told you his country (although I do know the continent ;) )
Who said this :o
These ex-pros see footballers being treated as mini-celebrities, earning ridiculous money, and it gets to them because they didn’t get the same wages in their day. It’s not our fault — we just came into the game in a good time. But they’re desperate to criticise us. They might have had successful careers, with lots of medals, but they seem bitter because they don’t have much else to show for it. Some of the criticism is fair and that’s OK, of course, but I think there’s more to it than that.
Who said this :oThese ex-pros see footballers being treated as mini-celebrities, earning ridiculous money, and it gets to them because they didn’t get the same wages in their day. It’s not our fault — we just came into the game in a good time. But they’re desperate to criticise us. They might have had successful careers, with lots of medals, but they seem bitter because they don’t have much else to show for it. Some of the criticism is fair and that’s OK, of course, but I think there’s more to it than that.
i remember that from when it was first in my morning paper
it was titus bramble in the guardian he was talking about lineker and co slating him on MODedit
here i found this
[link2:1uc6wd9u]titus,http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/dec/12/titus-bramble-wigan-daniel-taylor%5B/link2:1uc6wd9u%5D
Sadly, I think I know this…..didn’t the Indians want to play bare-footed and Fifa refused to allow them to?Correct, well done
in the 1950 World Cup Finals.There is a reason that FIFA would not let India play in the 1950 World Cup Finals, forcing them to withdraw, what the devil was that reason?
Was it because they out-sourced it and couldn’t play by phone?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
