› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › WTF????
- This topic has 21 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by Vat69.
-
AuthorPosts
-
13 July 2010 at 11:43 am #39900
“Mexican winger Pablo Barrera is set to complete a £4m switch from Pumas to West Ham on a two-year contract, with the option of a third, subject to gaining a work permit.
Full story: Daily MirrorUpton Park could also be the destination for Nice striker Loic Remy. The 23-year-old is keen to make the move and manager Avram Grant is closing in on a £12m deal.
Full story: Daily Mirror ”I’m not being funny but how can a club who are (according to their owners) over £100mill in debt afford to fork out an alleged £16mill in transfers without having raised a single penny (that I can remember) from any outgoing transfers??
13 July 2010 at 1:20 pm #39907Probably doing the sensible thing by buying before they sell….
13 July 2010 at 4:02 pm #39911It is beyond belief, TL.
Almost as much as Jimmy Bullard allegedly asking Celtic for £75k per week and keeping a straight face.
As Les Bagg is fond of saying, it’s the game that will (already has?) eat itself
13 July 2010 at 5:18 pm #39913On the subject of Jimmy Bullard – I liked him at latics but the way he left always left a sour taste in my mouth. However he has always been able to maintain this “I play football for my love of the game & aint a mercenary like so many other footballers” image.
I hope his conduct in the Hull/celtic transfer saga has put that image well & truly to bed.
With regards to West Ham, IMO the FA should contact the club to ask them how, if they are £110mill in debt that they can be trying to spend so much on transfers & offered Henry & Beckham £100k a week each.
The days of clubs spending vast amounts that they don’t have should be stopped13 July 2010 at 8:15 pm #39922A Hull journalist on Talksport claimed Bullards wages could rise to £60k per week if he plays regularly for Hull due to display clauses in his contract.
13 July 2010 at 11:25 pm #39933Mr TL
Fair points about the financial state of them f£ckers Cheat Ham but “WTF” is anybody believing what is written in that rag redtop…..I wouldn’t believe the date on the front page.
14 July 2010 at 12:42 am #39946jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
14 July 2010 at 12:53 am #39948jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
Well at least he has got his fishing to fall back on when it all goes t i t s up for him ! I didnt rate him anyway and I have said this many moons ago on here. Oh yeah and he aint funny either, which I have also said before ! :oops:
14 July 2010 at 12:56 am #39949jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
Hmmmmm! interesting story Mr Loudmouth, however, it’s not been written with your usual panache…………
………………..it’s as if someone else wrote on your behalf. Now you wouldn’t allow that now chap – would you.
;)
14 July 2010 at 1:02 am #39951Well at least he has got his fishing to fall back on when it all goes t i t s up for him ! I didnt rate him anyway and I have said this many moons ago on here. Oh yeah and he aint funny either, which I have also said before ! :oops:the only reason i posted the thing about bullard is because in a media like this one where, rumour and chinese whispers are the norm, something was posted that tried to portray bullard in a certain light and something that i heard with my own ears from the cats mouth is relevant to that posting i will let it be known,the point i will make again is the whole world of football-
agents/players administrators and media is verry very murky to say the least.Hmmmmm! interesting story Mr Loudmouth, however, it’s not been written with your usual panache…………
………………..it’s as if someone else wrote on your behalf. Now you wouldn’t allow that now chap – would you.;)
you want to explain that to me as its straight over the top of my head.
14 July 2010 at 12:03 pm #39971Mr TLFair points about the financial state of them f£ckers Cheat Ham but “WTF” is anybody believing what is written in that rag redtop…..I wouldn’t believe the date on the front page.
I don’t know whether you are referring to my comments on Jimmy Bullard or West Ham.
If the West Ham comments – admittedly the transfer targets stuff has come from paper gossip & yes I should know better but the info regarding their debt & attempts to get Henry & Beckham have come from radio & TV interviews with Gold & Sullivan that I’ve seen & heard14 July 2010 at 12:16 pm #39972jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
LMB – I don’t know Jimmy Bullard, nor do I know anyone that does know him but I have heard the same story (& very similar ones) from other people.
All I will say that is if a footballer was telling a story regarding him leaving a club to a bunch of fishing mates or drinking mates & he knows that a good proportion of those mates support the club he has just left, that is going to have a big bearing on the version of events that he tells those people.
That’s why I have taken these stories with a big pinch of salt, just as I have with those that I have heard direct from the club in the press & via people, who know people etc.. who work at Latics
Take a combination of all the version of events & you will probably get to somewhere nearer the truthHis contract conduct at Fulham, where he started to demand a new & improved contract very soon after returning from a major injury, having a handful of games under his belt & with a couple of years still left on his contract didn’t look too hot to me either
Now I aint saying that in the same circumstances I would have acted any differently, or would have done the same with the proposed switch to Celtic, but he’s as mercenary as the rest of um & the fact his carefully sculptured media image portrays him otherwise grates on me
14 July 2010 at 7:41 pm #39991jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
LMB – I don’t know Jimmy Bullard, nor do I know anyone that does know him but I have heard the same story (& very similar ones) from other people.
All I will say that is if a footballer was telling a story regarding him leaving a club to a bunch of fishing mates or drinking mates & he knows that a good proportion of those mates support the club he has just left, that is going to have a big bearing on the version of events that he tells those people.
That’s why I have taken these stories with a big pinch of salt, just as I have with those that I have heard direct from the club in the press & via people, who know people etc.. who work at Latics
Take a combination of all the version of events & you will probably get to somewhere nearer the truthHis contract conduct at Fulham, where he started to demand a new & improved contract very soon after returning from a major injury, having a handful of games under his belt & with a couple of years still left on his contract didn’t look too hot to me either
Now I aint saying that in the same circumstances I would have acted any differently, or would have done the same with the proposed switch to Celtic, but he’s as mercenary as the rest of um & the fact his carefully sculptured media image portrays him otherwise grates on me[/quote]
the trouble with your theory and reason behind bullards tale of events is, this took place in lymm ,warrington, none of the other people there to my knowledge ever watched wigan,i had never been in his company before that night and at the time he didnt know i watched wigan.
but the main reason his story, no matter how much he embellished his version,has a ring of truth to it,is latics did exactly the same to jason roberts not long after.
the rest is your opinion and paper message board rumour that you have used to form an opinion of bullard,all i know about this latest episode is
hull city have tried to force him into a move to celtic, which for what ever reason he doesnt want and that as i said in my first post,was told to me personally by someone who is still best of mates with jimmy bullard.15 July 2010 at 12:41 am #40014Looks like he has taken up American football !
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:MBLK … yFavre.jpg15 July 2010 at 12:09 pm #40029jimmy bullard did not want to leave us FACT, when he signed his new contract just before our first premiership game v chelsea he had a clause in it to increase his wages with a contract extention if we stayed up, latics chose not to honour it and to make him available, they did a deal with fulham,bullard told paul jewell he didnt want to leave and was told he wasnt wanted,how do i know bullard himself told a number of people including myself in the starr inn in lymm after a fishing match that i was in along with bullard,
one of the lads who i was with that night,a fishing acquaintance,is still mates with bullard , i saw this person on saturday and bullards name cropped up in our conversation,he told me that hull were trying to off load him and his wages and only celtic wanted him,he had been up for a look round at celtic but decided he didnt want to go there,hull basically told him he was going like it or not,fo bullard has dug his heels in and refused.now that may or may not be why he is demanding more money ,my contact only said he didnt want to go there – it just shows that sometimes there is more to the murky world of pro football than what the clubs/players/press tell us.
LMB – I don’t know Jimmy Bullard, nor do I know anyone that does know him but I have heard the same story (& very similar ones) from other people.
All I will say that is if a footballer was telling a story regarding him leaving a club to a bunch of fishing mates or drinking mates & he knows that a good proportion of those mates support the club he has just left, that is going to have a big bearing on the version of events that he tells those people.
That’s why I have taken these stories with a big pinch of salt, just as I have with those that I have heard direct from the club in the press & via people, who know people etc.. who work at Latics
Take a combination of all the version of events & you will probably get to somewhere nearer the truthHis contract conduct at Fulham, where he started to demand a new & improved contract very soon after returning from a major injury, having a handful of games under his belt & with a couple of years still left on his contract didn’t look too hot to me either
Now I aint saying that in the same circumstances I would have acted any differently, or would have done the same with the proposed switch to Celtic, but he’s as mercenary as the rest of um & the fact his carefully sculptured media image portrays him otherwise grates on me[/quote]
the trouble with your theory and reason behind bullards tale of events is, this took place in lymm ,warrington, none of the other people there to my knowledge ever watched wigan,i had never been in his company before that night and at the time he didnt know i watched wigan.
but the main reason his story, no matter how much he embellished his version,has a ring of truth to it,is latics did exactly the same to jason roberts not long after.
the rest is your opinion and paper message board rumour that you have used to form an opinion of bullard,all i know about this latest episode is
hull city have tried to force him into a move to celtic, which for what ever reason he doesnt want and that as i said in my first post,was told to me personally by someone who is still best of mates with jimmy bullard.[/quote]“but the main reason his story, no matter how much he embellished his version,has a ring of truth to it,is latics did exactly the same to jason roberts”
I never said his story couldn’t have a ring of truth about it, just that if the story came from his mouth, as he’s holding court with a group of people, he is going to embellish it just as Latics weren’t going to come out with things that painted them (or Whelan) in a bad lightAs with what you’ve been told about his proposed move to Celtic because you’ve heard it direct from him or from someone who heard it direct from him, you’ve taken it as the truth whilst dismissing any other stories on the matter & that’s just as flawed a basis for believing something than mine
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › WTF????