- This topic has 39 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
To be fair Johnny, these 2 were quite good!
They didn’t actually play together as a pair that much though…….it was usually one or the other.
At Wembley, Mc Arthur played right wing back.
To be fair Johnny, these 2 were quite good!
They didn’t actually play together as a pair that much though…….it was usually one or the other.
At Wembley, Mc Arthur played right wing back.[/quote]
Well McCarthur seemed to think that they were a good partnership and I seem to remember them being an integral part of our relegation avoiding team!
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/james-mcarthur-partnership-forged-james-1119500
Well how many times can we say any midfielder has a partner. Morsy and Beavises mate play well in the team together but would they be classed as a midfield partnership or simply two midfielders just like midfielders before Bullard and Kavanagh and midfielders since. Indeed were Bullard and Kavanagh strictly partner’s. They played in a midfield of four just like the two mentioned who play in a midfield of five today.
Oh does it really matter, we’re winning at the moment and playing great as a team in general.Well how many times can we say any midfielder has a partner. Morsy and Beavises mate play well in the team together but would they be classed as a midfield partnership or simply two midfielders just like midfielders before Bullard and Kavanagh and midfielders since. Indeed were Bullard and Kavanagh strictly partner’s. They played in a midfield of four just like the two mentioned who play in a midfield of five today.
Oh does it really matter, we’re winning at the moment and playing great as a team in general.Who on earth is ‘Beavises mate’?
Well how many times can we say any midfielder has a partner. Morsy and Beavises mate play well in the team together but would they be classed as a midfield partnership or simply two midfielders just like midfielders before Bullard and Kavanagh and midfielders since. Indeed were Bullard and Kavanagh strictly partner’s. They played in a midfield of four just like the two mentioned who play in a midfield of five today.
Oh does it really matter, we’re winning at the moment and playing great as a team in general.Who on earth is ‘Beavises mate’?[/quote]
Butt-head!
Fuck the EFL
To be fair Johnny, these 2 were quite good!
They didn’t actually play together as a pair that much though…….it was usually one or the other.
At Wembley, Mc Arthur played right wing back.[/quote]
I think you’re letting time cloud your memory. They played together in the middle of the park more than they didn’t – & by a long stretch.
The only reason McArthur played right wing back at Wembley was because we were down to the bare bones of the squad as everyone was dropping like flies – that’s the same reason Espinoza was at left wing backWell how many times can we say any midfielder has a partner. Morsy and Beavises mate play well in the team together but would they be classed as a midfield partnership or simply two midfielders just like midfielders before Bullard and Kavanagh and midfielders since. Indeed were Bullard and Kavanagh strictly partner’s. They played in a midfield of four just like the two mentioned who play in a midfield of five today.
Oh does it really matter, we’re winning at the moment and playing great as a team in general.Who on earth is ‘Beavises mate’?[/quote]
Butt-head![/quote]
Still not getting the significance. Am I missing something??? Edit: Sorry…got it. I was being thick
Not funny really. I can’t understand that head butt malarkey. If I did it I’d end up worst off with a gash or a golf ball lump.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
