The FSF have campaigned long and hard to get Wigan Athletic fans a better deal in football, well they campaign for all football fans and not just for financial justices, but also trying to get a fairer deal with the police as well.

I have personally watched Latics for over 35 years and for a very large chunk of that I have followed them the length and breadth of the country. On my travels I have seen far too many time the heavy handed way the ‘local’ police force CHOOSE to deal with fans.

Some officers look as though they are there just top start something so they can sort it out and become the hero. I have witnessed on more occasions than I care to remember, how these bastions of our safety have laid into innocent football fans. Too many times it is/was they that started it all off or provoked fans to get a reaction.

Most recently was at Bolton where police were arresting fans by association rather than because of them actually doing anything. Anyway this brings me back to the reason for this piece, the FSF have for a long time backed everything I have just mentioned and have this week published an update as to their concerns about the police.

The basic facts are that they have too many ‘made up laws’ that only apply to football fans (no other sporting supporters), borne out of an age when hooliganism was the norm (in their eyes, see above). Drinking on the way to a ground? Banning orders for watching games on TV in pubs? Banning orders if you are arrested within a certain distance of a ground after the game?

Something needs to be done and the FSF are trying…..The full story from
During 2010-11 the total number of arrests at football matches fell 9% from the previous year according to Home Office statistics. Only one in every 12,249 spectators found him or herself arrested at a match and there were no arrests at more than 70% of games. Not a single football-related arrest of England or Wales supporters overseas took place either.

Yet the stereotype of football fans as violent, racist, drunken hooligans persists. It’s a situation exacerbated by the more reactionary elements of the media who happily ignore these positive numbers but report the odd (totally unacceptable) individual case of hooliganism as though it was symptomatic of a widespread disease. It isn’t.

But the game’s supporters face a barrage of legal restrictions not applied to followers of any other sport, never mind the rest of society. As football fans we can be banned by the courts from attending games and required to surrender our passports via Football Banning Orders (FBO) without any criminal conviction. The FSF has sat in on these cases and the evidence threshold required is scarily low as many FBOs are given out on the balance of probabilities rather than beyond all reasonable doubt.

Combine this with many judges’ total lack of understanding of fans’ culture and it’s a dangerous cocktail. Here’s one simple example; football fans regularly travel to games without tickets. If you’re a regular you’ll know hundreds of your fellow fans and chances are you’ll get your hands on a ticket. This doesn’t mean you’re a hooligan, it means you’re resourceful. Judges don’t understand this and it’s been cited by prosecution solicitors as one of the grounds for an FBO.

Speaking at the FSF’s annual conference in 2010 Shami Chakrabarti compared FBOs to control orders. FBOs prevent citizens entering designated areas in cities and towns across the UK on football matchdays. With Olympics and Euro 2012 coming up those on FBOs will have to surrender passports for seven weeks over the summer months. It’s an astonishing show of power by the police which generally receives unquestioning media coverage.

FBOs can be given out for fairly trivial, non-violent offences such as pitch encroachment or drinking in sight of the football pitch – the latter being a criminal offence at football only. There’s other legislation that applies to football fans and no other groups in society too.

Drink on organised transport, such as a supporters’ coach, on your way to a game and you’re liable to be prosecuted. “Kettling” has gone on at football for years except police refer to it as a “bubble” or “escort”. Sell a spare ticket to your mate at face value and you can be prosecuted as a tout. Does this happen at a Westlife concert? Not that we’re fans of their music, you understand…

Other legislation is applied (or, more correctly, misapplied) to football supporters as well. One recurring example is Section 27 of the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006. This power, intended to deal with problem drinkers in public or semi-public places (such as pubs), has been roundly abused by the police to round-up and “deport” peaceful football fans causing no trouble whatsoever.

In one case Stoke City fans enjoying a pint in a pub on the outskirts of Manchester were rounded up by police who told them they were to be required to leave Greater Manchester as they were likely to contribute to alcohol-related disorder. They were herded onto coaches and “deported” to Stoke, including one Potters supporter who actually lived in Manchester. The pub’s landlord said the fans had been no problem and that he’d even put sandwiches on for them if they came back!

Some of the fans involved approached the FSF; we teamed up with Liberty and received crucial financial support from Stoke City for legal action. As a result Greater Manchester Police agreed to review its guidance to officers on the use of Section 27. Oh, and the fans involved received almost £200,000 compensation between them.

The police have often relied on the fatalism and reluctant acquiescence of football supporters when using disproportionate tactics but the rules of the game are changing. Online forums give fans an outlet to express their anger when unjust police tactics are used. Groups like the FSF and Liberty can help channel that frustration into meaningful change and understanding between supporters and police.

Yes, those guilty of criminal acts should be charged and prosecuted – that’s not in dispute. But violence at football is incredibly rare and fans deserve to be treated on their actions rather than reputations.

Click here to disucuss this issue and many more on the Cockney Latic message board.


Cockney Latic is an independent Wigan Athletic fans site and as such, if you feel you have an article, story or feature you would like to see on the site, please let us know.

We are always looking for fans which wish to put new articles on the site, whether they are one offs, or if they become a regular feature. If you’re interested, send your details or articles to us and we will publish them or get in touch. The email as usual is

The upkeep of the site is funded solely from the advertising on site, from our own pockets and donations from users, if you would like donate it would be greatly appreciated, click here for donation page.