1. It is very low compared to private sector pay for senior managers, directors, etc.
2. Very surprised the cheating, lying, immoral fckrs haven’t bumped it up before now
yea take off the sick and poor and look after themselves sounds right
as a republican i would love to see a independent north of england ruled by the people for the people
and not ruled by royalty or the southern softies
we were told last week that we aint getting a pay rise (AGAIN) this will make it 4 years since our last one and that was a measly 1%…managers etc have got one though!!!! and they wonder why we don’t want to communicate in any way/shape or form with them or take what they say seriously……this country is screwed up and a political mess
we were told last week that we aint getting a pay rise (AGAIN) this will make it 4 years since our last one and that was a measly 1%…managers etc have got one though!!!! and they wonder why we don’t want to communicate in any way/shape or form with them or take what they say seriously……this country is screwed up and a political mess
I totally understand companies having a pay freeze when times are tough, but managers taking a pay rise whilst workers get nothing is simply immoral.
we were told last week that we aint getting a pay rise (AGAIN) this will make it 4 years since our last one and that was a measly 1%…managers etc have got one though!!!! and they wonder why we don’t want to communicate in any way/shape or form with them or take what they say seriously……this country is screwed up and a political mess
I totally understand companies having a pay freeze when times are tough, but managers taking a pay rise whilst workers get nothing is simply immoral.[/quote]
Don’t worry , when you add in the expenses and perks ,they’re on a tidy little number – especially when you consider that unlike Skinner and a few others , few of them treat it as a nine to five job.
The “none of the above” option has never been more appealing. :angry:
Don’t worry , when you add in the expenses and perks ,they’re on a tidy little number – especially when you consider that unlike Skinner and a few others , few of them treat it as a nine to five job.
The “none of the above” option has never been more appealing. :angry:[/quote]
As a teenager I quite fancied a ‘career’ in politics :ohmy:
Can’t quite believe it now. In fact, the trouble is too many of them see it as a ‘career’ rather than a vocation, or a desire to serve others, which in my opinion is what it should be.
It’s not even divided along party lines. Whilst he’s not a politician, I was reading about Arthur Scargill and his ‘benefits for life’ package that includes a second home in London that costs the NUM £35,000 a year.
It’s no wonder so many have become apathetic towards politics.