- This topic has 23 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
To be honest im fuming at this.
WTF gives some newspaper the right to see the English National Manager lose his job, just as we have someone of our own nationality and a belly full of fire.
I don’t particularly like the guy due to his past links, however I think he would have given this England team the kick up the arse they need and looked forward to seeing what he could do.
The paper clearly knew that as a result of their “undercover” operation that he would lose his job – what a great example of how to do your job well, by getting someone else the sack by setting them up behind their back.
Why do this now, knowing he has only just started ?
To me, is just pure evil and I actually do feel sorry for the guy, all he has done has offered his opinion and advice, he has not been paid and has spoken just like I would to someone when not in the office.
He has been an idiot yes, naïve yes, but deserve the sack ? No ..
Has anyone condemned the newspaper for their behavior ?
“Clarke told the BBC he had not been sacked, but they had agreed his position was “untenable”.
Fuck the EFL
To be honest im fuming at this.WTF gives some newspaper the right to see the English National Manager lose his job, just as we have someone of our own nationality and a belly full of fire.
I don’t particularly like the guy due to his past links, however I think he would have given this England team the kick up the arse they need and looked forward to seeing what he could do.
The paper clearly knew that as a result of their “undercover” operation that he would lose his job – what a great example of how to do your job well, by getting someone else the sack by setting them up behind their back.
Why do this now, knowing he has only just started ?
To me, is just pure evil and I actually do feel sorry for the guy, all he has done has offered his opinion and advice, he has not been paid and has spoken just like I would to someone when not in the office.
He has been an idiot yes, naïve yes, but deserve the sack ? No ..
Has anyone condemned the newspaper for their behavior ?
Couldn’t agree more crammy, British press at their worst, again… After what they’ve been upto lately and got away with!
Thats why the game is going to the dogs, money and greed, well done to the Telegraph for making it public, i hope they name and shame plenty more and they are brought before the courts and face the consequences!
Allardyce deserves all he gets, more bent than a nine bob note that mon!
Fuck the EFL
When we want Coyle’s opinion we’ll ask for it :dry:
To be honest im fuming at this.WTF gives some newspaper the right to see the English National Manager lose his job, just as we have someone of our own nationality and a belly full of fire.
I don’t particularly like the guy due to his past links, however I think he would have given this England team the kick up the arse they need and looked forward to seeing what he could do.
The paper clearly knew that as a result of their “undercover” operation that he would lose his job – what a great example of how to do your job well, by getting someone else the sack by setting them up behind their back.
Why do this now, knowing he has only just started ?
To me, is just pure evil and I actually do feel sorry for the guy, all he has done has offered his opinion and advice, he has not been paid and has spoken just like I would to someone when not in the office.
He has been an idiot yes, naïve yes, but deserve the sack ? No ..
Has anyone condemned the newspaper for their behavior ?
An irrelevant argument. That’s a completely separate issue. Are you really saying that corruption is OK, and we should just keep looking away if it comes to our notice?
The Telegraph (and trust me, I hate them only less than the S*n and the Fail) have obviously been tipped off about large scale corruption in football, and have acted upon it. Whether what they have done is ethical or not is not the point. They have exposed that there are significant people in the game who are open to taking dodgy money.
And the victims of this are us, the paying punters. How are we to know that a game hasn’t been rigged? Unless the game is seen to be well-policed (there will always be the odd dodgy character) and in general played honestly, then we may as well go and watch WWE.
I hold reservations on the newspaper’s behaviour and methods, but not on their right to investigate thoroughly. But I do condemn Allardyce et al for their avarice that puts the integrity of the game we love into question.
Investigative journalists also uncovered the corruption that was rife in FIFA which lead to the downfall of both Batter and Platini.
It would be blatant hypocrisy to applaud journalists for exposing the wrongdoings in FIFA but condemn them for doing the same in this instance.
To be honest im fuming at this.
WTF gives some newspaper the right to see the English National Manager lose his job, just as we have someone of our own nationality and a belly full of fire.
I don’t particularly like the guy due to his past links, however I think he would have given this England team the kick up the arse they need and looked forward to seeing what he could do.
The paper clearly knew that as a result of their “undercover” operation that he would lose his job – what a great example of how to do your job well, by getting someone else the sack by setting them up behind their back.
Why do this now, knowing he has only just started ?
To me, is just pure evil and I actually do feel sorry for the guy, all he has done has offered his opinion and advice, he has not been paid and has spoken just like I would to someone when not in the office.
He has been an idiot yes, naïve yes, but deserve the sack ? No ..
Has anyone condemned the newspaper for their behavior ?
An irrelevant argument. That’s a completely separate issue. Are you really saying that corruption is OK, and we should just keep looking away if it comes to our notice?
The Telegraph (and trust me, I hate them only less than the S*n and the Fail) have obviously been tipped off about large scale corruption in football, and have acted upon it. Whether what they have done is ethical or not is not the point. They have exposed that there are significant people in the game who are open to taking dodgy money.
And the victims of this are us, the paying punters. How are we to know that a game hasn’t been rigged? Unless the game is seen to be well-policed (there will always be the odd dodgy character) and in general played honestly, then we may as well go and watch WWE.
I hold reservations on the newspaper’s behaviour and methods, but not on their right to investigate thoroughly. But I do condemn Allardyce et al for their avarice that puts the integrity of the game we love into question.[/quote]
I’d have to agree with you Garswood
I’d also go a step further & say that the Telegraph aren’t selecting people at random & hoping to hit gold, but rather they’re selecting people who they’ve been told from others are up to dodgy stuff
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
