- This topic has 23 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
State the obvious. Course we haven’t got the quality of those three but we have a couple of strikers who could play together or off each other and a proven winger so attacking the opposition could be an option.Theirin lies an option other than this dire tripe that gets pushed on us week in week out. We were forced to watch Caldwell’s shite this season and everyone noticed we aren’t exactly Barcelona either.
I was fairly upbeat and positive when WJ was appointed our manager but now all that has gone and his obstinance has got a déjà vu feel to it!
I reckon about 47 points would be enough to survive and so therefore from our remaining 16 games even if we lost 7 of them, 6 wins and 3 draws would be enough, surely that is do-able right?
I still have a semblance of positivity but it wanes on a weekly basis !I reckon about 47 points would be enough to survive and so therefore from our remaining 16 games even if we lost 7 of them, 6 wins and 3 draws would be enough, surely that is do-able right?
I still have a semblance of positivity but it wanes on a weekly basis !Basically 7 wins out of 16 to get us to 47 points.
That’s what Yootha needs to focus on, 7 WINS. Any 7 from 16 will do…starting tomorrow!!
FFS go for it. If we are going down then go down kicking and screaming. At the moment it looks like we’re going down with barely a wimper.
State the obvious. Course we haven’t got the quality of those three but we have a couple of strikers who could play together or off each other and a proven winger so attacking the opposition could be an option.Theirin lies an option other than this dire tripe that gets pushed on us week in week out. We were forced to watch Caldwell’s shite this season and everyone noticed we aren’t exactly Barcelona either.Judging by last night (30% possession, 1 shot on goal with two strikers) that two-up-top shite doesn’t work.
Lets go for three, no, in fact four strikers!
Hint of sarcasm there Standish.As Mr Garswood said ‘We’re not playing two up top’. Maybe after those statistics you quoted we may start that system soon.
Take anything on Saturday. Any result but a loss.Donny, anything but a draw or loss would do me. :woohoo:
Nothing less than 3 points on Saturday lads. 2-0 Latics!
Fuck the EFL
State the obvious. Course we haven’t got the quality of those three but we have a couple of strikers who could play together or off each other and a proven winger so attacking the opposition could be an option.Theirin lies an option other than this dire tripe that gets pushed on us week in week out. We were forced to watch Caldwell’s shite this season and everyone noticed we aren’t exactly Barcelona either.
Judging by last night (30% possession, 1 shot on goal with two strikers) that two-up-top shite doesn’t work.
Lets go for three, no, in fact four strikers![/quote]
Who won? We did. Two strikers isn’t just about scoring goals it pins the opposition back instead of letting them press high up the field which a lone isolated striker allows. The Sheff Weds game is perfect example to why we should have 2 up top. We flooded midfield they just went long and by passed it and won the game in typical tandem striker fashion. We effectively play most games with ten men coz we cannot get the lone striker into the game. It tickles me as to why most on here think our tactics and formation are right when we have the worst home record in the league and are lowest scorers as well. We are in a relegation place so on which planet is this one up top working coz it certainly isn’t on this one.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
