› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Enough chances
- This topic has 24 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by Chris Griffin.
-
AuthorPosts
-
3 February 2010 at 6:08 pm #21232
acefacen
i have read various posts on here slateing certain players off and no one as said anything about bramble,he had a nightmare,time and time again he was caught in a world of his own.All credit to county they came with a game plan and it work for them[/quote]
And Scharner. Dreadful.
3 February 2010 at 6:24 pm #21237Aceface for what it’s worth. taken from post “The end of the world” Horc disagree Sinclair thought he was the best of a bad bunch.
“Bramble had a poor game positionally and far far too often launched a long ball nearly always to the opposition. In midfield the experienced Scharner and Koumas both looked clueless, Scharners passing was abysmal (for me he should be competing for the centre half position not midfield) whilst Koumas looked half interested, quite why people go on all the time about Scotland who is improving and at least puts the effort in,(he was given very little support last night again) whilst Koumas is still at the club amazes me. A good performance from Sinclair last night pity more didnt perform like him.”
3 February 2010 at 9:44 pm #21261Dont be slating Jason Scotland.
jrfatfan will have you….
3 February 2010 at 10:26 pm #21263Hey up I’m entitled to have an opinion. :roll:
Just for the record JS was not at fault for the two goals conceded last night, therefore in theory, at 0-0 after 90 / 120 mins he may have been able to redeem himself for the one one one miss and perhaps scored the penalty that may have just put us through.
As it happens he was not given the chance due to some ludicrous defending once again by bramble and co.Discuss??
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!4 February 2010 at 12:25 am #21275Hey up I’m entitled to have an opinion. :roll:Just for the record JS was not at fault for the two goals conceded last night, therefore in theory, at 0-0 after 90 / 120 mins he may have been able to redeem himself for the one one one miss and perhaps scored the penalty that may have just put us through.
As it happens he was not given the chance due to some ludicrous defending once again by bramble and co.Discuss??
I hope your’re not being serious. You can’t deflect his uselessness last night by blaming the defence.
We should have been at least 3 up with his sitters alone before they scored.4 February 2010 at 2:25 am #21304Hey up I’m entitled to have an opinion. :roll:
Just for the record JS was not at fault for the two goals conceded last night, therefore in theory, at 0-0 after 90 / 120 mins he may have been able to redeem himself for the one one one miss and perhaps scored the penalty that may have just put us through.
As it happens he was not given the chance due to some ludicrous defending once again by bramble and co.Discuss??
I hope your’re not being serious. You can’t deflect his uselessness last night by blaming the defence.
We should have been at least 3 up with his sitters alone before they scored.[/quote]
You’ve missed the point totally. Missing goals doesn’t lose you games, conceding them does. :xFrom Matlock to ManU
What a journey!4 February 2010 at 2:32 am #21306Delusion alert ! Abort abort !!!
4 February 2010 at 3:08 am #21308You’ve missed the point totally. Missing goals doesn’t lose you games, conceding them does.
Fook me “The Lunatic’s have taken over the Asylum” :roll:
4 February 2010 at 3:31 am #21310Hey up I’m entitled to have an opinion. :roll:
Just for the record JS was not at fault for the two goals conceded last night, therefore in theory, at 0-0 after 90 / 120 mins he may have been able to redeem himself for the one one one miss and perhaps scored the penalty that may have just put us through.
As it happens he was not given the chance due to some ludicrous defending once again by bramble and co.Discuss??
I hope your’re not being serious. You can’t deflect his uselessness last night by blaming the defence.
We should have been at least 3 up with his sitters alone before they scored.[/quote]
You’ve missed the point totally. Missing goals doesn’t lose you games, conceding them does. :x [/quote]
I would like to believe this was a tongue-in-cheek remark.4 February 2010 at 11:43 am #21315We should have been at least 3 up with his sitters alone before they scored.Get away Horc, he didn’t miss three sitters . :roll: Did he? :?
Admittedly, he had a few chances which he could, maybe should, have scored but he never goes hiding, I’ll give him that.
And for all the Gomez knockers, I hope you realised that he set up 3 or 4 (can’t remember how many exactly) great chances with passes that no-one else in our squad has the ability to pull off. Perhaps Koumas, if he could be ar$ed.
That said, I hope neither of them play on Saturday :lol:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Enough chances