- This topic has 59 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I agree with everything you have wrote. I was very disapointed with my fellow Wigan supporters Booing and leaving the game before the end.
I also agree with what you wrote about the pies, worst pies ever, when we went to last Blackburn away game, their pies were so much nicer considering Wigan is the town supposed to be known for their pies. One more thing, I do think Martinez is wrong choosing Caldwell to be Captain.
Regards
LindaGood first post’Linda’. As well as Blackburn having nicer pies than us, do you think their players have nicer legs than our players?
BTW are you interested in worms?That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy.
The term “darksiders” is not a self proclaimed one as you wrongly state it was penned by a stalwart of this board and jumped on by pratts like you who don’t have a original thought in your skulls.
So moving on, just who are this so called “dark side” you mention, well I’ll tell you, they are a group of about 10 or 15 people who rant on message boards, myself being one of them, for Christ’s sake the whole Wigan Athletic cyber world subscribers consist of no more than 100 lost souls – these are not the hundreds booing in the stadium, or thousands leaving their seats at the DW when the last nail goes in, they are people fed up of the boring sideways passing, lack of penetration and comical defending that has been the norm for the whole of Martinez’s reign.
Darksiders are not “self-proclaimed” – I was responsible for that.FACT!
;)
sorry griff i didnt know if you wanted to be ‘outed’ for that term so that is why i said “stalwart of the board” – but why not – it was ‘original’ at the time and very funny incidentaly
That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy.
In stead of criticising why dont you do loudmouth
That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy.In stead of criticising why dont you do loudmouth
i’ve made a comment in my post so it offers you a position to debate it – please feel free to do so
No debate you was slagging off a member about what he had written put up or shut up
No debate you was slagging off a member about what he had written put up or shut upyou are not very bright are you ?
I have made a comment about an article that i dont think is correct and have stated some of my reasons why, it gives anyone an opportunity to tell me i am wrong or perhaps some may even agree – it is what is known as debate – not slagging off in any way, but as i said before you dont have the physical attributes to comprehend that it seems, perhaps we can debate that point as well.
I won’t hold my breath
LMB, you posted this.
That article is an absolute pile of crap
If that’s not slagging off, what is it?
BTW not read the article,can’t be bothered.
LMB, you posted this.That article is an absolute pile of crap
If that’s not slagging off, what is it?
BTW not read the article,can’t be bothered.
i think you may note this is what i typed in full, not the selective version you chose.
“That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy“.
there is a fundemental difference in both meanings,
but i know you knew that
LMB, you posted this.
That article is an absolute pile of crap
If that’s not slagging off, what is it?
BTW not read the article,can’t be bothered.
i think you may note this is what i typed in full, not the selective version you chose.
“That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy“.
there is a fundemental difference in both meanings,
but i know you knew that[/quote]
See, I would have removed the “absolute pile of crap” and left it as “That article is riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy”. But that’s just me – I don’t like to upset people, you see :dry:
LMB, you posted this.
That article is an absolute pile of crap
If that’s not slagging off, what is it?
BTW not read the article,can’t be bothered.
i think you may note this is what i typed in full, not the selective version you chose.
“That article is an absolute pile of crap riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy“.
there is a fundemental difference in both meanings,
but i know you knew that[/quote]
See, I would have removed the “absolute pile of crap” and left it as “That article is riddled with rhetoric, nonsense and inaccuracy”. But that’s just me – I don’t like to upset people, you see :dry:[/quote]
“you dont like to upset people” – i nearly choked on that one – nearly as funny as the childish “slaphead” remark i read on saturday.
In actual fact i nearly did what you suggest, but i re read it just to make sure, and there are that many holes in the piece i decided that my first reaction was quite correct so i left well alone.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
