- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
It has been in some media lately, but not wholeheartedly backed, but what about the idea of a ‘fit and proper test’ for players.
At the end of the day these guys are employees, now if I was recruiting for my business I would do my best to find out if they were convicted of anything first before giving them a £2m+ annual pay.
What do you think??
It has been in some media lately, but not wholeheartedly backed, but what about the idea of a ‘fit and proper test’ for players.At the end of the day these guys are employees, now if I was recruiting for my business I would do my best to find out if they were convicted of anything first before giving them a £2m+ annual pay.
What do you think??
It’s up to the employer, ie the club that signs somebody. It’s not as if Whelan and the club couldn’t have found about King’s past. After all, everyone else in football and the media knew about it.
Fit and proper tests are fine for OWNERS who would subsequently have no-one to answer to.
Nope, I don’t think it matters if a sports person has a criminal record.
Many sportsmen/women have a bit of a “chequred” past. They often get pushed into sports because they come from tough backgrounds and maybe schooling didn’t seem like much of an option for them.
Many of these people find that success in sports gives them a chance to make something of themselves, I don’t see how taking that chance away from them helps anyone.
Now sports people who continually get themselves in the cack even after making it in their sport is a different matter..King,Barton etc etc!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
