› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Interesting change in odds..
- This topic has 26 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 11 months ago by filmoss.
-
AuthorPosts
-
26 May 2012 at 10:51 pm #88104
…Ladbrooks have Brendan Rodgers favourite for the Liverpool job even though he has apparently turned down the opportunity to speak to them. :woohoo:
http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/liverpool-specials/next-permanent-manager
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!27 May 2012 at 3:40 am #88108 AnonymousBob is still favourite but drifting you numpy :huh:
27 May 2012 at 4:48 am #88109Bob is still favourite but drifting you numpy :huh:Did you mean you numpty you fekin numpty? :P
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!27 May 2012 at 12:33 pm #88110 AnonymousIs’nt numpty the guy who fell off the wall ?…
27 May 2012 at 3:36 pm #88119Is’nt numpty the guy who fell off the wall ?…No it was the person who thought 4/5 was a shorter price than 4/6 on Ladbrokes. B)
Fitzsimons said Bob is still favourite but drifting you numpy :huh:
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!27 May 2012 at 10:52 pm #88127 AnonymousMaths is not yer strong point is it fatman?
28 May 2012 at 12:35 am #88141Maths is not yer strong point is it fatman?Lets put this to bed epelepticfitz. At the time I initially posted, Bobby was 4/5 and Rodgers was 4/6 with Ladbrooks. That means AT THAT TIME Rodgers was favourite.
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!28 May 2012 at 12:39 am #88142 AnonymousMaths is not yer strong point is it fatman?
Lets put this to bed epelepticfitz. At the time I initially posted, Bobby was 4/5 and Rodgers was 4/6 with Ladbrooks. That means AT THAT TIME Rodgers was favourite. :whistle:[/quote]
I think somday else called you that JR maybe a wum ?
28 May 2012 at 2:34 am #88153what?
repeat please.
do you think that keepnets should be banned, apart from matches?
28 May 2012 at 3:12 am #88162 AnonymousOh i give up!
4/5 is shorter odds than 4/6 , ie bobby was,and is, favourite u plonker.
And yes i meant numpty,not numpy goodpost28 May 2012 at 3:46 am #88163Oh i give up!
4/5 is shorter odds than 4/6 , ie bobby was,and is, favourite u plonker.
And yes i meant numpty,not numpy goodpostWill someone with half a brain explain how these odds things work to this thick wazzuck, he thinks 4/5 is shorter odds than 4/6? :blink:
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!28 May 2012 at 4:38 am #88166Oh i give up!
4/5 is shorter odds than 4/6 , ie bobby was,and is, favourite u plonker.
And yes i meant numpty,not numpy goodpostEr, sorry fella but 4/5 is NOT shorter odds than 4/6.
A tenner at 4/5 returns £8.
A tenner at 4/6 returns £6.67Simply multiply your stake by the first number (4) then divide the answer by the second number (5 or 6).
28 May 2012 at 12:02 pm #88169Oh i give up!
4/5 is shorter odds than 4/6 , ie bobby was,and is, favourite u plonker.
And yes i meant numpty,not numpy goodpostThere really is nothing better than someone making a fool of themselves in public and in writing. ;)
Fair play though, for persistence. You had me questioning my own sanity for a while there until Northern and JR restored it!
28 May 2012 at 12:19 pm #88171 AnonymousWell you live and learn,good job im not a gambler then!
I apologise profusely and youre not a plonker !
:oops:29 May 2012 at 4:33 pm #88239Well you live and learn,good job im not a gambler then!
I apologise profusely and youre not a plonker !
:oops:I must give credit Mr Sharples at Cardinal Newman school for the maths ‘o’ level (ask someone over 40 kids) that enabled me to not make a twat of myself with that post ;)
You’ve no idea just how many times I checked, double checked and triple checked my sums before submitting!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Interesting change in odds..