- This topic has 20 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
What, the same Coyle that insisted the club paying him £30k a week for three years?
*And you accuse me of talking shit :woohoo:
[/quote]What’s your point? Who else made the decision to give him a ridiculous contract? You? you seem to know everything else. Or maybe you know someone else who thinks they do and knows your gullible enough to fall for their shit.[/quote]
Griff please take a friendly word of advice you will realise what a prick you are making of yourself when you sober up so just leave it for now. What on earth has Coyle’s tenure at the club got to do with Ramis’s contract or wages ?
edit
I have just realised in your drunken stupor you may be confusing Ramis with Holt, who was mentioned as well.
Well to answer who sanctioned his wages ask your football playing buddy, as I think both him and his boss must have been the ACTUAL ones who sanctioned that “ridiculous contract”[/quote]
Do you know what, you are absolutely right. Even before I saw your edit I realised I was indeed talking about Holt. Consider yourself in receipt of an unreserved apology! Sorry.
And yes, they would have sanctioned it. But only because he asked for it. Just like Martinez asked for even more for Boselli, before you throw that at me! ;)[/quote]
I wouldn’t dream of it.
Btw did you have a good return to the drinking fold, I imagine its been like having a nagging toothache listening to those post match rants from the Leyland clan without the numbing effect of alcohol.
muppet
Go away, the big children are having an argument, here. Nothing to do with the likes of you.[/quote]
You call that stuff an argument. Wait until I get going.
What, the same Coyle that insisted the club paying him £30k a week for three years?
*And you accuse me of talking shit :woohoo:
[/quote]What’s your point? Who else made the decision to give him a ridiculous contract? You? you seem to know everything else. Or maybe you know someone else who thinks they do and knows your gullible enough to fall for their shit.[/quote]
Griff please take a friendly word of advice you will realise what a prick you are making of yourself when you sober up so just leave it for now. What on earth has Coyle’s tenure at the club got to do with Ramis’s contract or wages ?
edit
I have just realised in your drunken stupor you may be confusing Ramis with Holt, who was mentioned as well.
Well to answer who sanctioned his wages ask your football playing buddy, as I think both him and his boss must have been the ACTUAL ones who sanctioned that “ridiculous contract”[/quote]
Do you know what, you are absolutely right. Even before I saw your edit I realised I was indeed talking about Holt. Consider yourself in receipt of an unreserved apology! Sorry.
And yes, they would have sanctioned it. But only because he asked for it. Just like Martinez asked for even more for Boselli, before you throw that at me! ;)[/quote]
I wouldn’t dream of it.
Btw did you have a good return to the drinking fold, I imagine its been like having a nagging toothache listening to those post match rants from the Leyland clan without the numbing effect of alcohol.[/quote]
Fortunately, the Leyland clan stay outside the pub so we don’t have to mix with them for that long. Plus, of course, they leave after 78 minutes, so it’s only pre-match that we run the risk of bumping into them ;)
muppet
Go away, the big children are having an argument, here. Nothing to do with the likes of you.[/quote]
You call that stuff an argument. Wait until I get going.[/quote]
Have you just thanked yourself in an alter ego?
muppet
Go away, the big children are having an argument, here. Nothing to do with the likes of you.[/quote]
You call that stuff an argument. Wait until I get going.[/quote]
Have you just thanked yourself in an alter ego?[/quote]
It was a joke, based on a question I was asked in another thread, but as always I wouldn’t expect you to understand.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
