- This topic has 24 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
whats in your name 57?
is it your age.?I thought it was to do with his bowling figures at cricket, or perhaps something to do with a local baked beans factory.[/quote]
5 for 7 are not bad figures.
I think we would all be happy with figures of 5 for seven, but being hit for 57 wouldn’t be too good, unless of course you had bowled a lot of overs or taken a lot of wickets.
Figures or 0 for 57 off 3 overs is bad, but figures of 6 for 57 off 31 overs would obviously be good. We really need to know how many overs were bowled and how many wickets were taken, or perhaps he just works for Heinz and hates cricket.
I had figures of 7 for 23 once quite chuffed with that :D
I had figures of 7 for 23 once quite chuffed with that :DExcellent figures, no wonder you were chuffed.
I am intelligent by the way…. 57 was more near the age of your mums ages on average when they got it
I am intelligent by the way…. 57 was more near the age of your mums ages on average when they got itThat intelligent sentence doesn’t make any sense at all. Oh, the irony.
It does StandishStalker
I beg to differ:
‘I am intelligent by the way…. 57 was more near the age of your mums ages on average when they got it’
Even with correct punctuation it doesn’t read correctly:
‘I am intelligent by the way. 57 was more near the age of your mums’ (note the correct use for an apostrophe with the plural of mum) the ages, on average, when they got it.’
Does this imply that our mothers were fifty seven, on average, when they first had sexual intercourse? Goodness me, what an insult that is.
The Standish Walker – ask your dad who he was.
I am intelligent by the way…. 57 was more near the age of your mums ages on average when they got itok then , here’s another question,
do you consider yourself thick?
Do you consider yourself….Shut up?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
