- This topic has 39 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I suppose it’s better than having no sign.
The vandalism will just cost more council money to sort out, and they get their money from council tax. Any muppet can see that it’s going to cause nothing but problems if there’s repeated vandalism on the signs.
The vandalism will just cost more council money to sort out, and they get their money from council tax. Any muppet can see that it’s going to cause nothing but problems if there’s repeated vandalism on the signs.a council spokesman said “it did not cost anything as we had some signs left and used those”,
if this is the case and if he is NOT telling lies like we all think he is, it should not cost any more money as i assume they are not going to replace the defaced ones – :roll:
or do you think that the council direct works department chief, who i actually know is a BIG wigan rugby fan just might manage to find a few more spares not being used. :oa council spokesman said “it did not cost anything as we had some signs left and used those”,They already had some signs saying “Super League Champions 2010”? That was clever planning, I’ll let that bloke pick my lottery numbers. :roll:
Seriously though, spray painting the sign? Infantile, pathetic, retarded. I’ll bet it was someone who posts on here
Seriously though, spray painting the sign? Infantile, pathetic, retarded. I’ll bet it was someone who posts on hereInfantile, pathetic, retarded, definitely not me then, I would have been more grown up and smeared excrement on it.
Seriously though, spray painting the sign? Infantile, pathetic, retarded. I’ll bet it was someone who posts on here
Infantile, pathetic, retarded, definitely not me then, I would have been more grown up and smeared excrement on it.[/quote]
not me i would have painted ‘martinez out’ on it in a DARK colour. ;)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
