maynard

Forums Latics Crazy Forum maynard

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #126670

    Terrar.

    Blimey, he didn’t last long did he?

    #126677
    jimmycjimmyc
    Player
      Doesnt contribute much does he?

      Agree, he looks poor to me. McEachran came on and looked class so nothing to do with fitness.

      #126678
      psklpaul tymon
      Player

        Being a west stander couldnt get up quick enough to see with the old knees ;-)

        #126682

        To see with the old knees?

        What’s wrong with the old eyes?

        I suppose a cap is a help in both cases.

        #126687
        I would start them both

        Who would you drop?

        I’d leave the team as it is, but swap Fortune for Maynard.

        #126688
        Give the lad a chance……no point just lumping it up to him and he did score with virtually his only clear chance of the game. Too quick to write players off at Wigan, better to look in the centre of the park where Watson and McArthur create nowt!

        I thought McArthur had a decent game. He’s not creative, but did the ugly stuff well.

        #126689
        psklpaul tymon
        Player

          Cant see when people are pn there feet and i cant get off my seat because of my owd knees

          #126693

          I sympathise. It’s very annoying when people stand up at every attack.

          As soon as one excitable but antisocial person stands up, everyone behind them has to stand up to see as well.

          If everyone remained seated, then everyone would be able to see.

          #126694
          psklpaul tymon
          Player

            They should stay seated at all times that is why they call them all seated stadiums

            #126696
            donnys pageDonnys Page
            Player

              Maynard was shoite but playing in our formation he would be. No strike partner and no midfielder playing off him or behind him. First half was terrible but second hslf it was an onslaught but without any quality in the box. The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal . Fortune is average at best. Again with a strike partner and a long cosistent run could improve but please Rosser lad play both our half strikers together. There wasnt much wrong with Ellington and Roberts with Liddel and Super Lee in Midfield.

              #126699
              Maynard was shoite but playing in our formation he would be. No strike partner and no midfielder playing off him or behind him. First half was terrible but second hslf it was an onslaught but without any quality in the box. The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal . Fortune is average at best. Again with a strike partner and a long cosistent run could improve but please Rosser lad play both our half strikers together. There wasnt much wrong with Ellington and Roberts with Liddel and Super Lee in Midfield.

              Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?

              #126700
              Terrar.

              Blimey, he didn’t last long did he?

              probably couldn’t stand the stench

              #126701
              ’I’m in the South Stand and one of theirs defo put it in the net’

              Need to move places…..view obviously obstructed!

              Well ??? :whistle:

              #126704
              oldengoldieoldengoldie
              Player

                just saying , there player 100 percent put the ball in the net for the disallowed goal ,

                #126706

                and?

                I might put the breeding boxes up weekend after next.

                Ultima flo-cast.

              Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

              Forums Latics Crazy Forum maynard