maynard

Forums Latics Crazy Forum maynard

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #126707
    thty5yearswafctrevor hoy
    Player

      video highlights from yesterday hope it clears it up for the bickering folk

      #126709
      bob16alec almond
      Player

        He had a goal disallowed before we levelled the score,if you noticed.

        #126712

        video highlights from yesterday hope it clears it up for the bickering folk

        It does, it was an OG.

        Thanx mate

        #126714
        Squire Manny BrownBB
        Player
          The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal .

          Or to put it another way – he didn’t put a foot wrong and produced a touch of sheer quality that led to our first goal.

          Welcome to Wigan Athletic Josh – you’d better learn to run around a lot very quickly.

          #126715
          jimmycjimmyc
          Player

            The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal .

            Or to put it another way – he didn’t put a foot wrong and produced a touch of sheer quality that led to our first goal.

            Welcome to Wigan Athletic Josh – you’d learn to run around a lot very quickly.[/quote]

            Funny how we all see players differently! How can anybody pick fault with this guy.
            I thought josh looked class when he came on. Always had his head up looking for the next pass, and that through ball for fortune was sublime! Let’s hope it’s not a one off and he gets better with every game he plays.

            #126716
            horchorc
            Manager

              Maynard was shoite but playing in our formation he would be. No strike partner and no midfielder playing off him or behind him. First half was terrible but second hslf it was an onslaught but without any quality in the box. The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal . Fortune is average at best. Again with a strike partner and a long cosistent run could improve but please Rosser lad play both our half strikers together. There wasnt much wrong with Ellington and Roberts with Liddel and Super Lee in Midfield.

              Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?[/quote]

              We have scored 30 goals in 27 games and only four teams have scored less than us, that tells me that we need to look at a different system than half a striker up front.
              I don’t know what the exact answer is, but our goals scored tally is going to hamper any play off push we might be aspiring to.
              Just because Roberto Martinez brought in this type of system at Wigan it doesn’t mean a different system can’t work.
              After all, he brought in the 50 passes before crossing the halfway line system, and the pass it to a colleague just for the sake of it system and that boring shite has thankfully been discarded with, so why not try two strikers up front, we certainly wouldn’t score less goals.

              #126718

              Maynard was shoite but playing in our formation he would be. No strike partner and no midfielder playing off him or behind him. First half was terrible but second hslf it was an onslaught but without any quality in the box. The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal . Fortune is average at best. Again with a strike partner and a long cosistent run could improve but please Rosser lad play both our half strikers together. There wasnt much wrong with Ellington and Roberts with Liddel and Super Lee in Midfield.

              Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?[/quote]

              We have scored 30 goals in 27 games and only four teams have scored less than us, that tells me that we need to look at a different system than half a striker up front.
              I don’t know what the exact answer is, but our goals scored tally is going to hamper any play off push we might be aspiring to.
              Just because Roberto Martinez brought in this type of system at Wigan it doesn’t mean a different system can’t work.
              After all, he brought in the 50 passes before crossing the halfway line system, and the pass it to a colleague just for the sake of it system and that boring shite has thankfully been discarded with, so why not try two strikers up front, we certainly wouldn’t score less goals.[/quote]

              The lone striker approach has got nothing to do with Martinez, stop being so obsessed!!! Almost nobody plays with 2 strikers and 2 wingers as your mate Donny Dark Ages is advocating. Mind you, he thought McEachran was shite so all he is doing with each post he makes is demonstrating how far out of step he is with most other people’s opinions.

              #126719
              why not try two strikers up front, we certainly wouldn’t score less goals.

              It isn’t quite as simple as that. It rather depends on who the two strikers are and who gives them the ball.

              And if we put an extra person in attack, we’ll have one man fewer in midfield to supply the ball.

              It’s up to Rosler to find a system that suits his squad, or get a squad that can carry out his chosen plan.

              #126720
              loweylowey
              Player

                Work out roslers pts per game ratio and you will find the system is working.

                #126725
                horchorc
                Manager

                  Maynard was shoite but playing in our formation he would be. No strike partner and no midfielder playing off him or behind him. First half was terrible but second hslf it was an onslaught but without any quality in the box. The Chelski poser did one thing right leading to our first goal . Fortune is average at best. Again with a strike partner and a long cosistent run could improve but please Rosser lad play both our half strikers together. There wasnt much wrong with Ellington and Roberts with Liddel and Super Lee in Midfield.

                  Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?[/quote]

                  We have scored 30 goals in 27 games and only four teams have scored less than us, that tells me that we need to look at a different system than half a striker up front.
                  I don’t know what the exact answer is, but our goals scored tally is going to hamper any play off push we might be aspiring to.
                  Just because Roberto Martinez brought in this type of system at Wigan it doesn’t mean a different system can’t work.
                  After all, he brought in the 50 passes before crossing the halfway line system, and the pass it to a colleague just for the sake of it system and that boring shite has thankfully been discarded with, so why not try two strikers up front, we certainly wouldn’t score less goals.[/quote]

                  The lone striker approach has got nothing to do with Martinez, stop being so obsessed!!! Almost nobody plays with 2 strikers and 2 wingers as your mate Donny Dark Ages is advocating. Mind you, he thought McEachran was shite so all he is doing with each post he makes is demonstrating how far out of step he is with most other people’s opinions.[/quote]

                  I think it’s time for you to take a break Griff. I know you want to get to 10,000 posts but you don’t seem to want to debate anything anymore.
                  All you seem to want to do is slag people off and call them for daring to have a different opinion, outlook or post code to you.

                  You appear to be obsessed with making things up that haven’t been said and you quote things that simply aren’t there.
                  Where in any post has it said that two strikers and two wingers should be played?
                  I also didn’t read anywhere that Donny said McEachran was shite. He said he did one good thing that lead to our goal, is that untrue, or did he have a blinder? Perhaps he did have a blinder and I missed it, after all we always leave after 78 minutes don’t we??

                  As for RM, I am not obsessed with him I just don’t have the same opinion of him as you do and didn’t think the sun shone out of his arse like some did.
                  I know its hard for you to accept that not everyone agrees with you, but I think by now you should have realised that others also dare to differ from you on this subject.

                  I know you are a wind up merchant most of the time and your aim is to try to piss off as many posters as possible, but surely you could start putting a bit more effort and thought in to your posts, or has your meteoric rise up the literature ladder given you a feeling of grandeur and you are just too good to debate things with us mere mortals anymore?

                  #126726
                  galacTICSanjay Shah
                  Player
                    Terrar.

                    Blimey, he didn’t last long did he?

                    Jeez, this board is quiet enough without you scaring posters off Griff. You’ve changed man.

                    #126728

                    Griff scaring people, never. He don’t scare me and I’ m a short, fat ,bald old mon.

                    Anyone scared of pike’s teeth?

                    The fish I mean, not that chap in Dads. Army.

                    Mick Brown

                    #126733

                    Terrar.

                    Blimey, he didn’t last long did he?

                    Jeez, this board is quiet enough without you scaring posters off Griff. You’ve changed man.[/quote]

                    no he hasn’t

                    #126738
                    I think it’s time for you to take a break Griff. CG: Oh well, if you say so, I will. I know you want to get to 10,000 posts but you don’t seem to want to debate anything anymore.
                    All you seem to want to do is slag people off and call them for daring to have a different opinion, outlook or post code to you. CG: Wrong opinion, not different opinion

                    You appear to be obsessed with making things up that haven’t been said and you quote things that simply aren’t there.
                    Where in any post has it said that two strikers and two wingers should be played? CG: I think you’ll find that Donny Dipshit advocated two strikers and two wingers somewhere in another thread. Really can’t be arsed searching for it.
                    I also didn’t read anywhere that Donny said McEachran was shite. He said he did one good thing that lead to our goal, is that untrue, or did he have a blinder? Perhaps he did have a blinder and I missed it, after all we always leave after 78 minutes don’t we?? CG: We? My occasional 78-minute jibes are a good-natured joke betweeen me and Filmoss. Nowt to do with you, don’t flatter yourself. I couldn’t care less how much or how little football you watch

                    As for RM, I am not obsessed with him I just don’t have the same opinion of him as you do and didn’t think the sun shone out of his arse like some did.
                    I know its hard for you to accept that not everyone agrees with you, but I think by now you should have realised that others also dare to differ from you on this subject. CG: And you should have realised by now that I really couldn’t care less whether anyone agrees with me or not.

                    I know you are a wind up merchant most of the time and your aim is to try to piss off as many posters as possible, but surely you could start putting a bit more effort and thought in to your posts, CG: Well, as Our Lord, Jesus Christ once said – it is you who say it

                    #126749

                    Fookin ell, if I put as much effort into my fishing I would have a shed full of bites and a net full,

                    Just like you eh?

                    Micro mesh.

                  Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
                  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                  Forums Latics Crazy Forum maynard