› Forums › Non Football Stuff › pitch again
- This topic has 78 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
6 April 2010 at 5:25 pm #28800
Anonymous
From todays Daily Mail the oldpitch malarky has been brought up again
6 April 2010 at 6:07 pm #28801From todays Daily Mail the oldpitch malarky has been brought up againIts a shame that but the prem bosses have a lot more shout than the super league. if they did leave theres 3 rugby pitches at john rigby.they could hang the flags off the trees.its not nice is it.Aunt Dorris make sure they take all their belongings and shut the door on your way out cause we dont want you comeing back bye bye :D :D :D
6 April 2010 at 6:10 pm #28803Good luck to the Premier League re-writing legally binding contracts between clubs and councils.
6 April 2010 at 6:50 pm #28806Good luck to the Premier League re-writing legally binding contracts between clubs and councils.They don’t have to do that – Wigan Athletic will have to. Or actually, Whelco. Because Wigan Athletic have the same legal status, as I understand it unless the rumoured transfer of the ground to Latics actually ever happened, as Warriors do.
The Premier League is a club that we belong to. They can alter the rules of membership however they want to as long as it’s legal, ie not discriminatory.
The nearest example I can think of is membership of a golf club. The club can alter its rules to say for example that T-shirts with logos can’t be worn. It matters not to them if I personally have an agreement with a T-shirt company that I will always wear their shirts with their logos. That’s my problem. If I wish to remain a member I comply with the rules. However I do it.
6 April 2010 at 8:09 pm #28810The Premiership have already thrown their weight around to switch matches, if they wish to start again let the rugby deal with the consequences.
Let’s face it, they never fail to remind everyone how the DW Stadium doesn’t feel like home, and would jump ship at the drop of a hat if there was a viable alternative in the Wigan area.
6 April 2010 at 8:53 pm #28816but it wont effect championship football will it ;)
6 April 2010 at 10:55 pm #28825What about them moving to Deepdale or building somewhere in Leyland, Chorley or Blackpool.
That way it wouldnt be such a long journey for their fans.
6 April 2010 at 11:09 pm #28827There is some irony in the fact Latics regularly defend the rugby against accusations of damaging the pitch, yet it is the Utds and Evertons of this world, the very clubs a great many rugby fans claim to support, who are throwing in these official complaints!
There goes another spurious excuse for rugby fans who want Latics done away with, I’m sure another will be along in double quick time.
6 April 2010 at 11:41 pm #28830What about them moving to Deepdale or building somewhere in Leyland, Chorley or Blackpool.That way it wouldnt be such a long journey for their fans.
Bu&&er off, we don’t want the fat lardy arsed gits in Chorley.
6 April 2010 at 11:59 pm #28833If ya listen to the peanut huggers you would think they own the D.W Stadium.lets face it they have no shame at all?allso they think they geet Whelan over a barrell.its not time they were fooked off with their tail between their legs.fonacated scrounging klumps ;) ;) ;)
7 April 2010 at 12:51 am #28847ditto to having the w*nkstaines at leyland as well horc!
7 April 2010 at 12:52 am #28848Well we’re not having them come to Garswood United :shock:
7 April 2010 at 1:09 am #28852It looks well this we cant even give our lodgers away?their like the plague :o :o :o
7 April 2010 at 1:09 am #28853They they arent wanted in Chorley, Leyland or Garswood ?
Then there is only one option – close them down !
7 April 2010 at 1:11 am #28854Anonymous
A bit harsh that batch it’s not as though they tried to do that to us is it ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Non Football Stuff › pitch again