- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Let’s cut through the shit.
Takeover deal nearing completion. This secrecy agreement between Whelans and the prospective new buyers…..
Why the need for the secrecy?
Surely Whelans would possibly benefit from it being known, perhaps a rival bidder would be interested in paying more?
So why the secrecy and the agreement of privacy? Unless there’s something dodgy going on, which they don’t want us to know about.
You’ll all tell me I’m wrong and there’s nothing to worry about at all. Shoot me down in flames. But I don’t give one. To me, it’s very dodgy all this secrecy, and I think that little
Old Latics are in for a bumpy ride…..what are they hiding?Let’s cut through the shit.Takeover deal nearing completion. This secrecy agreement between Whelans and the prospective new buyers…..
Why the need for the secrecy?
Surely Whelans would possibly benefit from it being known, perhaps a rival bidder would be interested in paying more?
So why the secrecy and the agreement of privacy? Unless there’s something dodgy going on, which they don’t want us to know about.
You’ll all tell me I’m wrong and there’s nothing to worry about at all. Shoot me down in flames. But I don’t give one. To me, it’s very dodgy all this secrecy, and I think that little
Old Latics are in for a bumpy ride…..what are they hiding?How many takeover deals do you know of that have been carried out in public? You’ve never been renowned for your rationality and this is just another example.
It’s the way the business world works. We know that an offer has been made, that they are going over the details to try to come to an agreement and if and when that happens we’ll all be told. Simples!
Non-disclosure agreements are common practice. Whenever we’re pitching for business at work, nine times out of ten there’s a non-disclosure agreement signed so as not to alert competitors and scupper the deal.
Same in this case.
Neither party will want anything getting out that might derail the process.
And also due diligence checks need to be made due to dodgy owners from other climes in past takeovers. I trust Mr Whelan explicably to make sure the new owners have the clubs best interests at heart. Give it a chance Vat you never know.
Let’s cut through the shit.Takeover deal nearing completion. This secrecy agreement between Whelans and the prospective new buyers…..
Why the need for the secrecy?
Surely Whelans would possibly benefit from it being known, perhaps a rival bidder would be interested in paying more?
So why the secrecy and the agreement of privacy? Unless there’s something dodgy going on, which they don’t want us to know about.
You’ll all tell me I’m wrong and there’s nothing to worry about at all. Shoot me down in flames. But I don’t give one. To me, it’s very dodgy all this secrecy, and I think that little
Old Latics are in for a bumpy ride…..what are they hiding?In the same breath, the new buyers could pull out due to the deal going public and leave DW with the club still left to be sold and any future buyers unwilling to do business as he plasters it all over the press.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
